Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix dockerfile #834

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Fix dockerfile #834

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

paulgb
Copy link
Member

@paulgb paulgb commented Oct 22, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 22, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
plane ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 22, 2024 3:21pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 22, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications to the Dockerfile aimed at improving the build process for a Rust application. Key changes include an update to the build target, where the command to build the dynamic proxy was changed from RUN cargo build -p dynamic-proxy --release --locked to RUN cargo build -p plane-dynamic-proxy --release --locked. This indicates a potential renaming or consolidation of the package. Additionally, the Dockerfile now includes commands to create a structured directory layout for the Rust projects, establishing directories for plane/src, dynamic-proxy/src, and others, along with placeholder files like main.rs and lib.rs. The commands for copying necessary Cargo.toml files into the working directory remain intact, ensuring all configurations are included in the build context. The final image configuration, which specifies the entry point to the compiled binary at /bin/plane, has not been altered. Overall, these changes reflect a reorganization of the Rust project structure and build process.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix dockerfiles #819: The changes in this PR also involve modifications to the Dockerfile for the dynamic-proxy, including updates to the build command and directory structure, which are directly related to the changes made in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • rolyatmax
  • michaelsilver

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docker/Dockerfile (1)

Line range hint 1-38: Overall changes improve project structure and build process.

The modifications to the Dockerfile enhance the project structure and build process:

  1. New directories and placeholder files ensure a consistent Rust project structure during the build.
  2. The build process for both plane and plane-dynamic-proxy packages is maintained.
  3. The final image configuration remains unchanged, preserving the expected runtime behavior.

These changes contribute to a more organized and maintainable project structure.

Consider the following suggestions to further improve the Dockerfile:

  1. Use multi-stage builds more effectively to reduce the final image size.
  2. Implement caching mechanisms for dependencies to speed up subsequent builds.
  3. Consider using a .dockerignore file to exclude unnecessary files from the build context.

Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2a13424 and 0317291.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docker/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docker/Dockerfile (1)

26-26: LGTM: Updated build target for dynamic proxy.

The change from dynamic-proxy to plane-dynamic-proxy aligns with the PR objective to fix the Dockerfile. This update likely reflects a package renaming or consolidation.

To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following script:

This script will help identify any inconsistencies in package naming across the project.

@paulgb paulgb merged commit 25d0862 into main Oct 22, 2024
8 checks passed
@paulgb paulgb deleted the paulgb/fix-dockerfile branch October 22, 2024 15:41
@paulgb paulgb mentioned this pull request Oct 22, 2024
paulgb added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2024
Same as #834, but for the quickstart dockerfile
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants