-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: Use different search engine in private browsing #9
Comments
Can you explain the use case bit more. Why would you want to use a different search engine (not Kagi) in private browsing? In addition there are browsers (like Orion) which allow to specify a different search engine for private browsing. |
I'm not the OP, but I can hazard a guess: unlike approximately every other search engine available today, Kagi requires a login session tied to an individual user. You can have the greatest, most user-centric privacy policy on the planet, but that still ultimately requires users to trust Kagi to honor that policy as expected. There are numerous ways that this expectation could potentially be broken, with varying levels of probability. Some examples off the top of my head:
At least for me, it's possibilities like these -- however unlikely -- that make me hesitant to switch to Kagi in the first place, and would be doubly concerning in private browsing scenarios. Paying for a better service is an easy sell for me, but using a search engine that requires a unique login at all times is another matter entirely. Simply not signing into an account obviously isn't a perfect defense against all the examples above, but it's certainly a good start. Assuming something along these lines is a common reason why some Kagi users would want to use another service to perform private searches, I also wonder if some sort of blinded token, along the lines of Privacy Pass, could be an acceptable solution. It might only be viable to offer to users on an unlimited plan, but an authentication mechanism that can prove that I've paid to use the service without ever giving any indication whatsoever of who I am is something that I'd find very interesting. Even if it may be a bit overkill for the average user, offering an option to enforce privacy cryptographically rather than just legally would also be a great marketing signal for some of Kagi's more paranoid prospective users. |
@DanH42 You put that into much better words than I ever possibly could have, and you included a ton of nuance that I hadn't even considered. Thank you so much!! |
Just in case, Firefox, in addition to the already mentioned Orion browser, also supports setting a different search engine for private browsing. See https://superuser.com/a/1527549 You'll need to
And I personally prefer that to setting a Kagi's session link. |
A useful feature for me would be the ability to choose a different search engine in private-browsing mode instead of logging into Kagi. For example, I could set my search provider to Kagi, and in Kagi's settings I could choose to use DuckDuckGo in private-browsing mode.
My instinct is that this should be possible with the WebExtensions
browser.search
API in Firefox. Unfortunately it looks like Chromium'schrome.search
API doesn't have the necessary features.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: