Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(metarepos): do not use unnecessary labels #424

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

ijsong
Copy link
Member

@ijsong ijsong commented Apr 23, 2023

What this PR does

Because the metadata repository sets node id as resource service.instance.id, it does not need to
use a redundant label - nodeid.

Which issue(s) this PR resolves

Resolve #423

Because the metadata repository sets node id as resource `service.instance.id`, it does not need to
use a redundant label - `nodeid`.

Resolve #423
@ijsong ijsong requested a review from hungryjang as a code owner April 23, 2023 16:47
@ijsong
Copy link
Member Author

ijsong commented Apr 23, 2023

Current dependencies on/for this PR:

This comment was auto-generated by Graphite.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 77.77% and project coverage change: -0.10 ⚠️

Comparison is base (fc5b655) 63.77% compared to head (9e00509) 63.68%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #424      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.77%   63.68%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         131      131              
  Lines       17928    17894      -34     
==========================================
- Hits        11433    11395      -38     
- Misses       5949     5954       +5     
+ Partials      546      545       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
internal/metarepos/report_collector.go 77.33% <0.00%> (-0.10%) ⬇️
internal/metarepos/raft.go 79.74% <100.00%> (-0.15%) ⬇️
internal/metarepos/raft_metadata_repository.go 76.99% <100.00%> (-0.54%) ⬇️

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@ijsong
Copy link
Member Author

ijsong commented May 16, 2023

To stack multiple PRs linearly, I close this PR, duplicated to #445.

@ijsong ijsong closed this May 16, 2023
@ijsong ijsong deleted the otel_label branch March 5, 2024 06:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

metarepos: avoid unnecessary stringification
2 participants