Use `pattern.match(...)` instead of `re.match(pattern, ...)` in `RegexPredicate` and `EmailPredicate` #42

keithasaurus · 2024-04-09T17:18:43Z

Issue or goal of PR:

small perf boost

What I did

How to test

unit tests were written / updated

Documentation

Check one:

I updated documentation
OR
No documentation updates required

keithasaurus added 4 commits April 9, 2024 10:01

.match method

8bd43f5

changelog

f533040

capitalize

15dc79a

punct

8ed2d80

keithasaurus changed the title ~~- Use pattern.match(...) instead of re.match(pattern, ...) in RegexPredicate and EmailPredicate~~ Use pattern.match(...) instead of re.match(pattern, ...) in RegexPredicate and EmailPredicate Apr 9, 2024

keithasaurus merged commit e87258a into main Apr 9, 2024
15 checks passed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Use `pattern.match(...)` instead of `re.match(pattern, ...)` in `RegexPredicate` and `EmailPredicate` #42

Use `pattern.match(...)` instead of `re.match(pattern, ...)` in `RegexPredicate` and `EmailPredicate` #42

keithasaurus commented Apr 9, 2024

Use pattern.match(...) instead of re.match(pattern, ...) in RegexPredicate and EmailPredicate #42

Use pattern.match(...) instead of re.match(pattern, ...) in RegexPredicate and EmailPredicate #42

Conversation

keithasaurus commented Apr 9, 2024

Issue or goal of PR:

What I did

How to test

Documentation

Use `pattern.match(...)` instead of `re.match(pattern, ...)` in `RegexPredicate` and `EmailPredicate` #42

Use `pattern.match(...)` instead of `re.match(pattern, ...)` in `RegexPredicate` and `EmailPredicate` #42