Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Eliminate the wasteful updates due to the aggregated rules #49

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 30, 2020

Conversation

jcrossley3
Copy link
Contributor

For any ClusterRole with an aggregationRule, we read its rules from the database in the transformer, since the manifest will never contain the correct rules.

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jcrossley3

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 29, 2020
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. label Apr 29, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 29, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@markusthoemmes markusthoemmes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Neato!

For any ClusterRole with an aggregationRule, we read its rules from
the database in the transformer, since the manifest will never contain
the correct rules.
Could be an issue keeping labels/annotations around
@knative-metrics-robot
Copy link

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-knative-sandbox-operator-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/knativeserving/common/aggregated_rules.go Do not exist 76.9%

@houshengbo
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 30, 2020
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit 17d6058 into knative:master Apr 30, 2020
markusthoemmes pushed a commit to markusthoemmes/knative-operator that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2020
* 🍬 Adding 0.16.0 sugar controller

Signed-off-by: Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend@redhat.com>

* 🍰 Adding 0.16.1 sugar controller

Signed-off-by: Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants