Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Update to UBI9 to fix arm64 builds #636

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 22, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jmontleon
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Jason Montleon jmontleo@redhat.com

I know we weren't in a hurry to do this, however multi arch builds are experiencing odd failures on arm64 using UBI8.
https://github.com/konveyor/tackle2-ui/actions/runs/4168992831/jobs/7216425953#step:2:1067
https://github.com/konveyor/tackle2-ui/actions/runs/4174604421/jobs/7228394767#step:2:1077

I can reproduce much of this locally, and was able to workaround it using UBI9 node16 and node18 images without a problem both locally and within github actions:
https://github.com/jmontleon/tackle2-ui/actions/runs/4175222062/jobs/7229841318
https://quay.io/repository/jmontleon/tackle2-ui?tab=tags

I've opened an issue with qemu-user-static to see if there are any known issues we might be hitting, or other debugging steps we can try to resolve the issue, but this is probably our best bet to move on at the moment.
multiarch/qemu-user-static#185

Signed-off-by: Jason Montleon <jmontleo@redhat.com>
@gildub
Copy link
Contributor

gildub commented Feb 15, 2023

Upgrade to UBI9 put on hold because the entire tackle2 stack needs to be aligned.

See #638 for follow up.

gildub
gildub previously requested changes Feb 15, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@gildub gildub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jmontleon, that's interesting issue which gives an opportunity to bump to latest UBI.
Meanwhile we have to wait for the whole project to bump UBI along.

Copy link
Contributor

@gildub gildub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to make sure we don't merge too early.

@jmontleon
Copy link
Member Author

jmontleon commented Feb 15, 2023

@jmontleon, that's interesting issue which gives an opportunity to bump to latest UBI. Meanwhile we have to wait for the whole project to bump UBI along.

  • I don't agree with this. tackle2-addon-test-generator has been UBI 9 all along.
  • tackle2-addon-windup had to be bumped in order to get a publicly available s390x svn package (CentOS 8 did not have an s390x release). The windisco.com RPMS were originally for EL6 and i686 and x86_64 only, and were not used downstream.
  • in general for node and golang builds, all other things being equal, I don't view changing the distribution version as high risk. There's some, but not much.
  • Downstream does not have to change with us. I get that the desire is to keep drift minimal, but I know for a fact it won't be the first time ever we've been on different releases upstream and down (ansible-runner upstream moved WAY faster than downstream, and then I/we missed a product rename that had us sitting longer on EL7 down while containers upstream were well and away on 8. Also, see SVN above.)

@gildub gildub added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 16, 2023
@ibolton336 ibolton336 merged commit 70ff6b8 into konveyor:main Feb 22, 2023
@gildub gildub mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2023
@gildub gildub removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants