fix typos in configure-pod-container

[dkarczmarski]

fix typos in configure-pod-container

fix yaml paths,
from resources:requests to resources.requests,
from resources:limits to resources.limits,
the same as on the page https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/assign-pod-level-resources/#create-a-pod-with-cpu-requests-and-limits-at-pod-level

fix kubectl get ... commands

fix kubectl get ... -o yaml output

full output:

$ kubectl get pod pod-resources-demo --output=yaml --namespace=pod-resources-example
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  annotations:
    kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration: |
      {"apiVersion":"v1","kind":"Pod","metadata":{"annotations":{},"name":"pod-resources-demo","namespace":"pod-resources-example"},"spec":{"containers":[{"image":"nginx","name":"pod-resources-demo-ctr-1","resources":{"limits":{"cpu":"0.5","memory":"100Mi"},"requests":{"cpu":"0.5","memory":"50Mi"}}},{"command":["sleep","inf"],"image":"fedora","name":"pod-resources-demo-ctr-2"}],"resources":{"limits":{"cpu":"1","memory":"200Mi"},"requests":{"cpu":"1","memory":"100Mi"}}}}
  creationTimestamp: "2025-10-18T16:46:35Z"
  generation: 1
  name: pod-resources-demo
  namespace: pod-resources-example
  resourceVersion: "1546341"
  uid: d1b459bd-264c-4e9b-ad9a-1bdefb475d85
spec:
  containers:
  - image: nginx
    imagePullPolicy: Always
    name: pod-resources-demo-ctr-1
    resources:
      limits:
        cpu: 500m
        memory: 100Mi
      requests:
        cpu: 500m
        memory: 50Mi
    terminationMessagePath: /dev/termination-log
    terminationMessagePolicy: File
    volumeMounts:
    - mountPath: /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount
      name: kube-api-access-4bqlc
      readOnly: true
  - command:
    - sleep
    - inf
    image: fedora
    imagePullPolicy: Always
    name: pod-resources-demo-ctr-2
    resources: {}
    terminationMessagePath: /dev/termination-log
    terminationMessagePolicy: File
    volumeMounts:
    - mountPath: /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount
      name: kube-api-access-4bqlc
      readOnly: true
  dnsPolicy: ClusterFirst
  enableServiceLinks: true
  nodeName: demo1-worker
  preemptionPolicy: PreemptLowerPriority
  priority: 0
  resources:
    limits:
      cpu: "1"
      memory: 200Mi
    requests:
      cpu: "1"
      memory: 100Mi
  restartPolicy: Always
  schedulerName: default-scheduler
  securityContext: {}
  serviceAccount: default
...

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign urvashi0109 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• content/en/docs/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[netlify]

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	164bfbc
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/68f76fda5542a60008fc0943
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-52775--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[dkarczmarski]

@Caesarsage
hi :)
I commited your proposals.
i saw that you changed from 'Container' to 'container' - that seems to be a good idea,
however there are stil a lot of instances of "Container' written with capital letter in the documents. a

maybe we should change all of them for consistency or none ?
EDIT: ... or keep only this one change :)

[Caesarsage]

@Caesarsage hi :) I commited your proposals. i saw that you changed from 'Container' to 'container' - that seems to be a good idea, however there are stil a lot of instances of "Container' written with capital letter in the documents. a

maybe we should change all of them for consistency or none ? EDIT: ... or keep only this one change :)

Yes, i think it's a good idea

[dkarczmarski]

@Caesarsage hi :) I commited your proposals. i saw that you changed from 'Container' to 'container' - that seems to be a good idea, however there are stil a lot of instances of "Container' written with capital letter in the documents. a
maybe we should change all of them for consistency or none ? EDIT: ... or keep only this one change :)

Yes, i think it's a good idea

@Caesarsage
it's a good idea to :
a) change all of them in the entire document for consistency ( 'Container' to 'container' )
b) keep as it is now ( with the last chanages from code review )

EDIT:
I would not correct it in the entire document and choose b) , but of couse I can do it :)

[Caesarsage]

@Caesarsage hi :) I commited your proposals. i saw that you changed from 'Container' to 'container' - that seems to be a good idea, however there are stil a lot of instances of "Container' written with capital letter in the documents. a
maybe we should change all of them for consistency or none ? EDIT: ... or keep only this one change :)

Yes, i think it's a good idea

@Caesarsage it's a good idea to : a) change all of them in the entire document for consistency ( 'Container' to 'container' ) b) keep as it is now ( with the last chanages from code review )

EDIT: I would not correct it in the entire document and choose b) , but of couse I can do it :)

I will say b for now. Since this pattern cut across other files too. And this PR is not for that intent also.

[dkarczmarski]

@Caesarsage hi :) I commited your proposals. i saw that you changed from 'Container' to 'container' - that seems to be a good idea, however there are stil a lot of instances of "Container' written with capital letter in the documents. a
maybe we should change all of them for consistency or none ? EDIT: ... or keep only this one change :)

Yes, i think it's a good idea

@Caesarsage it's a good idea to : a) change all of them in the entire document for consistency ( 'Container' to 'container' ) b) keep as it is now ( with the last chanages from code review )
EDIT: I would not correct it in the entire document and choose b) , but of couse I can do it :)

I will say b for now. Since this pattern cut across other files too. And this PR is not for that intent also.

@Caesarsage
ok. so all your changes have been applied.
I also did a git squash.

so, everything seems to be ready :)

[Caesarsage]

Thanks, this looks good

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 1c7f5f69ed52566b77fdffaec9d0daa098bf0be9