You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a FastQ file with 3.2 billion reads that I'm currently mapping with BWA aln (not mem, but I guess it could have the same behaviour here).
This is the output log on the commandline: [bwa_aln_core] 2147221504 sequences have been processed. [bwa_aln_core] convert to sequence coordinate... 6.19 sec [bwa_aln_core] refine gapped alignments... 0.54 sec [bwa_aln_core] print alignments... 0.12 sec [bwa_aln_core] -2147483648 sequences have been processed. [bwa_aln_core] convert to sequence coordinate... 6.26 sec [bwa_aln_core] refine gapped alignments... 0.56 sec [bwa_aln_core] print alignments... 0.16 sec [bwa_aln_core] -2147221504 sequences have been processed. [bwa_aln_core] convert to sequence coordinate... 6.22 sec [bwa_aln_core] refine gapped alignments... 0.57 sec [bwa_aln_core] print alignments... 0.11 sec
As you can see, it counts the sequences correctly until C's MAX_INT and then starts using negative numbers at some point. Its more or less an optical thing, but still it would be more informative to have this fixed/enhanced.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have a FastQ file with 3.2 billion reads that I'm currently mapping with BWA aln (not mem, but I guess it could have the same behaviour here).
This is the output log on the commandline:
[bwa_aln_core] 2147221504 sequences have been processed. [bwa_aln_core] convert to sequence coordinate... 6.19 sec [bwa_aln_core] refine gapped alignments... 0.54 sec [bwa_aln_core] print alignments... 0.12 sec [bwa_aln_core] -2147483648 sequences have been processed. [bwa_aln_core] convert to sequence coordinate... 6.26 sec [bwa_aln_core] refine gapped alignments... 0.56 sec [bwa_aln_core] print alignments... 0.16 sec [bwa_aln_core] -2147221504 sequences have been processed. [bwa_aln_core] convert to sequence coordinate... 6.22 sec [bwa_aln_core] refine gapped alignments... 0.57 sec [bwa_aln_core] print alignments... 0.11 sec
As you can see, it counts the sequences correctly until C's MAX_INT and then starts using negative numbers at some point. Its more or less an optical thing, but still it would be more informative to have this fixed/enhanced.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: