Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade winston from 3.11.0 to 3.12.0 #311

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2024

Conversation

ludeknovy
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade winston from 3.11.0 to 3.12.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 22 days ago, on 2024-03-04.
Release notes
Package name: winston from winston GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: winston
  • 7816869 3.12.0
  • 9e5b407 missing timestamp format in ready-to-use-pattern example (#2421)
  • 4a85e6b bump deps (#2422)
  • e153c68 [chore] Run coveralls CI check on Node 20 not 16 (#2418)
  • 587f40f Bump @ types/node from 20.8.6 to 20.11.19 (#2413)
  • 8e99a00 Update README.md (#2417)
  • 0bde36b docs: fix anchor in transports docs (#2416)
  • 8fb5b41 add winston-transport-vscode to transports docs (#2411)
  • a326743 Bump @ babel/cli from 7.23.0 to 7.23.9 (#2406)
  • cc731ef Add winston-newrelic-agent-transport to transport documentation (#2382)
  • f077f30 Remove newrelic-winston transport entry. (#2405)
  • 3943c41 Bump eslint from 8.55.0 to 8.56.0 (#2397)
  • 8260866 Bump the npm_and_yarn group group with 1 update (#2391)
  • 333b763 Fix unhandled rejection handling (#2390)
  • c3f3b5b Fix all rimraf usages to the best of my ability; glob is not true by default in rimraf; file archive test only passed every other time using async rimraf, could use further investigation
  • 8f3c653 Fix rimraf usage in new test
  • f3836aa Fix rimraf import in test (why didn't this break in PR CI?)
  • 02d4267 Added functionality to long broken zippedArchive option (#2337)
  • 069a40d Bump async from 3.2.4 to 3.2.5 (#2378)
  • 79282e1 Bump @ babel/preset-env from 7.23.2 to 7.23.7 (#2384)
  • 05788b9 Bump winston-transport; fix test issue (#2386)
  • a7c2eec Bump eslint from 8.51.0 to 8.55.0 (#2375)
  • 85c336e Bump std-mocks from 1.0.1 to 2.0.0 (#2361)
  • 448d11c Bump actions/setup-node from 3 to 4 (#2362)

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 53.01%. Comparing base (40d6373) to head (514f8f8).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #311   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   53.01%   53.01%           
=======================================
  Files         101      101           
  Lines        1673     1673           
  Branches      151      151           
=======================================
  Hits          887      887           
  Misses        767      767           
  Partials       19       19           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 53.01% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ludeknovy ludeknovy merged commit c29671c into master Mar 26, 2024
6 checks passed
@ludeknovy ludeknovy deleted the snyk-upgrade-8556eac0fe067e2b6b3bb7eedb9e7eb1 branch March 26, 2024 07:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants