From 93b6f011a1c57fd4250b0fa5f6522adc179fffe1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Burns Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 17:42:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md --- README.md | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 4ee20a6..00775e3 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -27,7 +27,10 @@ class LoadOrder context.order = Order.find(context.id) end end +``` + +```ruby # after class LoadOrder include Interactify @@ -55,7 +58,6 @@ organize \ ->(c){ byebug if c.order.nil? }, Thing2 ``` -``` ### Each/Iteration @@ -225,10 +227,6 @@ end - Is this interactor/interactor-contracts compatible? Yes and we use them as dependencies. It's possible we'd drop those dependencies in the future but unlikely. I think it's highly likely we'd retain compatibility. -- Is this production ready? -It's used in production, but it's still early days. -There may be minor syntax changes that are proposed in future, but I don't foresee any major changes to how this will be implemented in public API terms. -We're bound by the interactor/interactor-contracts API, and bound by using it in production. - Why not propose changes to the interactor or interactor-contracts gem? Honestly, I think both are great and why we've built on top of them.