Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add parser round trip test to CI #298

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2022
Merged

Add parser round trip test to CI #298

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2022

Conversation

mbj
Copy link
Owner

@mbj mbj commented Feb 5, 2022

No description provided.

@mbj mbj changed the title Add parser roudn trip test to CI Add parser round trip test to CI Feb 5, 2022
@mbj mbj force-pushed the add/parser-test-on-ci branch 7 times, most recently from 93fa681 to ab1b234 Compare February 6, 2022 01:04
@mbj mbj force-pushed the add/parser-test-on-ci branch 3 times, most recently from fb60840 to 4fd4a7d Compare February 6, 2022 02:41
@mbj mbj self-assigned this Feb 6, 2022
@mbj mbj merged commit 76b4e3b into main Feb 6, 2022
@mbj mbj deleted the add/parser-test-on-ci branch February 6, 2022 02:47
require 'unparser'

$: << __dir__
# Hack to dynamically re-use the `parser` gems test suite on CI.
# The main idea is create a fake minitet runner to capture the
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minitet typo, fyi

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thx. Fixing on next touch.

@dgollahon
Copy link
Collaborator

nice!

@mbj
Copy link
Owner Author

mbj commented Feb 6, 2022

nice!

Yeah, mutants evolution is primarily bound by the time unparser does/does-not eat my limited time. Having this round-trip-tests directly on CI will reduce the time needed to discover new issues in unparser / new-syntax. Hence ideally will free up a lot of time on muant on the average year.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants