Skip to content

Conversation

@WillAyd
Copy link
Contributor

@WillAyd WillAyd commented Oct 8, 2025

No description provided.

@WillAyd WillAyd changed the title Fix naming issue with grpc find_library call to protoc Fix Windows naming issue with grpc find_library call to protoc Oct 8, 2025
@WillAyd WillAyd force-pushed the grpc-windows-compat branch from 011917e to cb55cce Compare October 8, 2025 11:52
@WillAyd WillAyd force-pushed the grpc-windows-compat branch 2 times, most recently from 3b72d8c to 1b0ae1d Compare October 8, 2025 11:58
@WillAyd
Copy link
Contributor Author

WillAyd commented Oct 8, 2025

Lots of CI failures here but I am of the impression that they don't have anything to do with this change and are pre-existing failures

@WillAyd
Copy link
Contributor Author

WillAyd commented Oct 16, 2025

Upon further inspection I believe the VS/macOS errors are due to an upstream bug - see grpc/grpc-dotnet#2646

@neheb any thoughts on this PR?

@neheb
Copy link
Collaborator

neheb commented Oct 16, 2025

pass something like

cpp.get_supported_arguments('-Wno-missing-template-arg-list-after-template-kw')

to cppflags.

@WillAyd WillAyd force-pushed the grpc-windows-compat branch from 1b0ae1d to 446cc47 Compare October 16, 2025 17:44
@WillAyd WillAyd force-pushed the grpc-windows-compat branch from 446cc47 to 55d50fa Compare October 16, 2025 17:45
@WillAyd
Copy link
Contributor Author

WillAyd commented Oct 16, 2025

That helped, although I'm guessing the remaining failures stem from this wrap version being a few years old.

@klokik I see from the comments that this file was generated by a script - do you know where that script is? Can we run it against the latest gRPC release?

@WillAyd
Copy link
Contributor Author

WillAyd commented Oct 20, 2025

@neheb looks like we probably need to update this configuration to make it compatiable with newer abseil releases.

My guess is that may end up being a significant amount of work. In its current state, the configuration also requires a lot of formatting updates. Should we do the formtting updates as a separate pre-cursor, or is the preference to still just do all of that in one PR?

@neheb
Copy link
Collaborator

neheb commented Oct 20, 2025

you can have multiple commits. No issue with that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants