Skip to content

xlgamma.cpp: Is it possible to use UCRT's lgamma now? #5577

@frederick-vs-ja

Description

@frederick-vs-ja

// TRANSITION, ABI: This should be superseded by the CRT's lgamma().

The TRANSITION, ABI comment has been present since the initial commit. However, it doesn't seem ABI-breaking to switch to use UCRT's lgamma (and its f, l variants).

Can we switch to use lgamma? Or, if not, should this comment be more detailed?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementSomething can be improvedfixedSomething works now, yay!

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions