Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Signed integer versions of bit-manipulation intrinsics cannot be thoroughly tested #934

Open
adpaco-aws opened this issue Mar 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Signed integer versions of bit-manipulation intrinsics cannot be thoroughly tested #934

adpaco-aws opened this issue Mar 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
[C] Feature / Enhancement A new feature request or enhancement to an existing feature.

Comments

@adpaco-aws
Copy link
Contributor

Signed versions of bit-manipulation intrinsics cannot be tested as thoroughly as the unsigned versions. This is due to the signed to unsigned conversion overflows which we cannot avoid due to their definition (see #778 for more details, and #880 #883 for other examples).
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws changed the title Signed integer versions of bit-manipulation intrinsics cannot be throughly tested Signed integer versions of bit-manipulation intrinsics cannot be thoroughly tested Mar 15, 2022
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws mentioned this issue Mar 15, 2022
Merged
4 tasks
This was referenced Apr 7, 2022
Merged
Merged
@celinval celinval added [C] Feature / Enhancement A new feature request or enhancement to an existing feature. and removed Area: testing labels Nov 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
[C] Feature / Enhancement A new feature request or enhancement to an existing feature.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@celinval @adpaco-aws