Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Partial support for bitreverse #779

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 27, 2022
Merged

Conversation

adpaco-aws
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes:

Adds partial support for the bitreverse intrinsic.

It is supposed to work until support is added in CBMC, but created #778 for tracking and doing the remaining work then.

Resolved issues:

Resolves #745
Opens #778

Call-outs:

Testing:

  • How is this change tested? Regression + new "fixme" test.

  • Is this a refactor change? No.

Checklist

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made
  • Methods or procedures are documented
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.

@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws requested a review from a team as a code owner January 26, 2022 20:39
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws requested a review from tautschnig January 26, 2022 20:49
Copy link
Contributor

@celinval celinval left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please describe what partial support means here? From the user perspective, what has changed with this PR?

@adpaco-aws
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you please describe what partial support means here? From the user perspective, what has changed with this PR?

Right, it would be best to claim support in the work for #778 and leave the current support value as it was. What do you think?

@adpaco-aws
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dropped the change on the table and sync'd with main.

Copy link
Contributor

@celinval celinval left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@celinval celinval merged commit c24b697 into model-checking:main Jan 27, 2022
This was referenced Mar 15, 2022
tedinski pushed a commit to tedinski/rmc that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2022
* Support for `bitreverse` (WIP)

* Add test for all types
tedinski pushed a commit to tedinski/rmc that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2022
* Support for `bitreverse` (WIP)

* Add test for all types
tedinski pushed a commit to tedinski/rmc that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
* Support for `bitreverse` (WIP)

* Add test for all types
tedinski pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2022
* Support for `bitreverse` (WIP)

* Add test for all types
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unimplemented intrinsic: bitreverse
2 participants