Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test for likely and unlikely intrinsics. #851

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 22, 2022

Conversation

adpaco-aws
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes:

Adds a missing test for the likely and unlikely intrinsics.

Resolved issues:

Part of #727

Call-outs:

Testing:

  • How is this change tested? One more test.

  • Is this a refactor change? No.

Checklist

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made
  • Methods or procedures are documented
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.

@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws requested a review from a team as a code owner February 22, 2022 00:20
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws merged commit fdc17eb into model-checking:main Feb 22, 2022
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws mentioned this pull request Feb 22, 2022
tedinski pushed a commit to tedinski/rmc that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2022
* Add test for `likely` and `unlikely` intrinsics.

* Format

* Remove let statments
tedinski pushed a commit to tedinski/rmc that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2022
* Add test for `likely` and `unlikely` intrinsics.

* Format

* Remove let statments
tedinski pushed a commit to tedinski/rmc that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
* Add test for `likely` and `unlikely` intrinsics.

* Format

* Remove let statments
tedinski pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2022
* Add test for `likely` and `unlikely` intrinsics.

* Format

* Remove let statments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants