Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Cable Bulk Import additional info #5399

Closed
elixdreamer opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Cable Bulk Import additional info #5399

elixdreamer opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jeremystretch
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application

Comments

@elixdreamer
Copy link

elixdreamer commented Dec 1, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Environment

  • NetBox version: v2.9.9

Proposed Functionality

Add some additional info to the CSV Field Options for side_a_type and side_b_type.
The info will include all possible ports that can be used to import Bulk cables.
After some digging in the code I found the following list, not sure if it is complete.
'consoleport', 'consoleserverport', 'interface', 'frontport', 'rearport', 'circuittermination'

Use Case

In a bulk cable import that was meant for Rear to rear ports I was unable to find the correct type that need to be used.
after creating a case it came to my knowledge that i had to use rearport iso Rear Port or dcim.rearport.
Probably some confusion could be for other interfaces. I have seen multiple issue reported the interface should be set with lower i.
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application labels Dec 2, 2020
@jeremystretch jeremystretch self-assigned this Dec 2, 2020
jeremystretch added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2020
@jeremystretch
Closes #5399: Show options for cable endpoint types during bulk import
2b0ddd2
@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

This will be added in v2.10.

@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue Dec 14, 2020
Merged
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 3, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@jeremystretch jeremystretch

Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@elixdreamer @jeremystretch