-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tier of Support: Linux perf and V8 --interpreted-frames-native-stack current state #261
Comments
I think we should move
This will be true for all tools that are tracked via this process. IMHO
I think |
As for the docs/guide I've been working on a guide for flame graphs using perf and it's been almost finished for a while, but I couldn't get it to display correct function names (yes, with the new flags) because of OS support issues. I wanted to figure those out before finally posting. |
Great @naugtur 😄 |
As pointed by @mcollina in #262, it makes more sense to evaluate Tool Analysis
|
This issue is stale because it has been open many days with no activity. It will be closed soon unless the stale label is removed or a comment is made. |
This issue is stale because it has been open many days with no activity. It will be closed soon unless the stale label is removed or a comment is made. |
I tried to summarize current state of requisites for
Linux perf
. Requisites are taken from Tier 1 (most complete set of requirements).There are some requirements that seem to be subjective (at least to me), which means it's not clear if a tool fulfills it or not.
Requisites
Tool Analysis
--perf-basic-prof has almost no documentation in organization Github or website
Based on this it is possible to have a more clear view of the current state and what is necessary to work on to move
Linux perf
to target tier. It is also an opportunity to debate if requirements are correct. Any ideas and opinions are welcome.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: