From 5059b6fcee4f90d77a6905bba82e384f898425ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikolai Vavilov Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:21:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] benchmark: fix typos PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11287 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig Reviewed-By: James M Snell Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung --- benchmark/README.md | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/benchmark/README.md b/benchmark/README.md index 8796e1e7b6ad38..d1233470757f20 100644 --- a/benchmark/README.md +++ b/benchmark/README.md @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ either [`wrk`][wrk] or [`autocannon`][autocannon]. path, hence if you want to compare two HTTP benchmark runs make sure that the Node version in the path is not altered. -`wrk` may be available through your preferred package manger. If not, you can +`wrk` may be available through your preferred package manager. If not, you can easily build it [from source][wrk] via `make`. By default `wrk` will be used as benchmarker. If it is not available @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ In the event you get a message that you need to select a CRAN mirror first. You can specify a mirror by adding in the repo parameter. -If we used the "http://cran.us.r-project.org" mirror, it could look somehting like -this: +If we used the "http://cran.us.r-project.org" mirror, it could look something +like this: ```R install.packages("ggplot2", repo="http://cran.us.r-project.org") @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ to be no improvements, then there shouldn't be any stars. **A word of caution:** Statistics is not a foolproof tool. If a benchmark shows a statistical significant difference, there is a 5% risk that this -difference doesn't actually exists. For a single benchmark this is not an +difference doesn't actually exist. For a single benchmark this is not an issue. But when considering 20 benchmarks it's normal that one of them will show significance, when it shouldn't. A possible solution is to instead consider at least two stars (`**`) as the threshold, in that case the risk