-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
--pending-deprecation process is underdocumented #18417
Comments
Not sure if this question belongs here or should go elsewhere. Gentle redirection welcome. Here we go: IIRC, there was disagreement when |
@Trott, well, it currently is not mentioned in any of the deprecation-relates documentation files, and users have no idea which actual deprecations does it reveal. I would be surprised if it's heavily used ;-). Imo, the cost of supporting I don't think that we can expect everyone to use it, but it provides a good mechanism for package authors to quickly notice forthcoming runtime-deprecations without their users being hit by those by default. Btw, @MylesBorins — does citgm track deprecation warnings and can it be run with |
Filed #18433 as a start. |
This is described as being a doc-only deprecation subset. Refs: nodejs#18417 PR-URL: nodejs#18433 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This adds a mention of `--pending-deprecation` flag effect in the Deprecated APIs document, and explicitly labels deprecations that support it. Refs: nodejs#18417 PR-URL: nodejs#18433 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Steps 1-2 closed by #18433. |
This is described as being a doc-only deprecation subset. Refs: #18417 PR-URL: #18433 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This is described as being a doc-only deprecation subset. Refs: #18417 PR-URL: #18433 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This is described as being a doc-only deprecation subset. Refs: #18417 PR-URL: #18433 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This adds a mention of `--pending-deprecation` flag effect in the Deprecated APIs document, and explicitly labels deprecations that support it. Refs: nodejs#18417 PR-URL: nodejs#18433 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This is described as being a doc-only deprecation subset. Refs: nodejs#18417 PR-URL: nodejs#18433 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This adds a mention of `--pending-deprecation` flag effect in the Deprecated APIs document, and explicitly labels deprecations that support it. Refs: nodejs#18417 PR-URL: nodejs#18433 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
I believe this is outdated and can be closed now. Adding |
Currently, there are at least three peaces of documentation mentioning deprecations:
--(no|trace|throw|pending)-deprecation
flags) (and a similar man page).--pending-deprecation
process is not documented in the first two of those, it's only documented as a cli switch that turns on some pending deprecations. Users have no way of knowing, without going to the source code and/or issues, which deprecations are revealed by that flag and which are not.Curently, that's only DEP0005 — (#11968).
Per #12519, not all doc-deprecated api should support
--pending-deprecation
(i.e. I don't think that--pending-deprecation
is a good idea for things that don't have a replacement yet and no concrete future plans of runtime-deprecation).My opinion is that:
--pending-deprecation
documentation #18433).--pending-deprecation
is a subclass of doc-deprecation and should be mentioned in the COLLABORATOR_GUIDE.md#deprecations as such (e.g. «Documentation-Only Deprecation … Documentation-only deprecations may trigger a runtime warning when launched with --pending-deprecation flag».--pending-deprecation
documentation #18433).doc/api/deprecations.md should be kept in sync with--pending-deprecation
, by specifing which of the doc-deprecations trigger a warning under that flag. See util: introduceutil.types.is[…]
type checks #18415 (comment).--pendining-deprecation
(I suggest the criteria «has a working replacement or concrete plans for future runtime-deprecation»).--pending-deprecation
, where possible. We don't doc-deprecate things not matching the criteria above anymore, do we?@nodejs/tsc thoughs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: