-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please stop using v8::BackingStore::Reallocate #52234
Labels
deprecations
Issues and PRs related to deprecations.
v8 platform
Issues and PRs related to Node's v8::Platform implementation.
Comments
I would like to make a PR |
marco-ippolito
added
deprecations
Issues and PRs related to deprecations.
v8 platform
Issues and PRs related to Node's v8::Platform implementation.
labels
Mar 28, 2024
Since the override was removed to be compatible with V8 sandboxed pointers for Electron, cc @nornagon @codebytere |
targos
added a commit
to targos/node
that referenced
this issue
Mar 31, 2024
It's being deprecated by V8. Explicitly allocate a new ArrayBuffer and copy the data instead. Fixes: nodejs#52234
targos
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 31, 2024
It's being deprecated by V8. Explicitly allocate a new ArrayBuffer and copy the data instead. Fixes: #52234
targos
added a commit
to targos/node
that referenced
this issue
Mar 31, 2024
It's being deprecated by V8. Explicitly allocate a new ArrayBuffer and copy the data when needed instead. Fixes: nodejs#52234 Co-authored-by: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
nodejs-github-bot
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node-v8
that referenced
this issue
Mar 31, 2024
It's being deprecated by V8. Explicitly allocate a new ArrayBuffer and copy the data instead. Fixes: nodejs/node#52234
targos
added a commit
to targos/node
that referenced
this issue
Mar 31, 2024
It's being deprecated by V8. Explicitly allocate a new ArrayBuffer and copy the data when needed instead. Fixes: nodejs#52234 Co-authored-by: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
nodejs-github-bot
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node-v8
that referenced
this issue
Apr 1, 2024
It's being deprecated by V8. Explicitly allocate a new ArrayBuffer and copy the data instead. Fixes: nodejs/node#52234
nodejs-github-bot
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node-v8
that referenced
this issue
Apr 2, 2024
It's being deprecated by V8. Explicitly allocate a new ArrayBuffer and copy the data instead. Fixes: nodejs/node#52234
targos
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 3, 2024
It's being deprecated by V8. Explicitly allocate a new ArrayBuffer and copy the data instead. Fixes: #52234
nodejs-github-bot
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node-v8
that referenced
this issue
Apr 3, 2024
It's being deprecated by V8. Explicitly allocate a new ArrayBuffer and copy the data instead. Fixes: nodejs/node#52234
nodejs-github-bot
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node-v8
that referenced
this issue
Apr 4, 2024
It's being deprecated by V8. Explicitly allocate a new ArrayBuffer and copy the data instead. Fixes: nodejs/node#52234
nodejs-github-bot
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node-v8
that referenced
this issue
Apr 5, 2024
It's being deprecated by V8. Explicitly allocate a new ArrayBuffer and copy the data instead. Fixes: nodejs/node#52234
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecations
Issues and PRs related to deprecations.
v8 platform
Issues and PRs related to Node's v8::Platform implementation.
V8 is deprecating and removing
v8::BackingStore::Reallocate
for being a safety footgun: https://issues.chromium.org/u/1/issues/331326406Node uses it currently AFAICT for some internal buffers. Note that since #43594, there is no performance benefit of using
Reallocate
. Node's override ofReallocate
defers to the default implementation, which allocates a new block of memory and performs a copy. It would be better to explicitly allocate a newv8::BackingStore
and explicitly memcpy for the current uses ofReallocate
.(If I have some time I'll try to make a PR. But if someone is inclined to change this, please do so!)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: