-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: fix arguments order #24151
Closed
Closed
test: fix arguments order #24151
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
the actual and expected arguments in assert.strictEqual() calls are in the wrong order. Any literal value should be the second argument while the first argument should be the value returned by a function/be the calculated value.
cjihrig
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2018
gireeshpunathil
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2018
BridgeAR
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2018
BridgeAR
added
the
code-and-learn
Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events.
label
Nov 6, 2018
trivikr
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2018
Landed in e1c4e91 |
Trott
pushed a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2018
the actual and expected arguments in assert.strictEqual() calls are in the wrong order. Any literal value should be the second argument while the first argument should be the value returned by a function/be the calculated value. PR-URL: nodejs#24151 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Thanks for the contribution! 🎉 (If you're interested in other possible contributions to Node.js but don't have a good idea of where to start looking, some ideas are posted at https://www.nodetodo.org/next-steps/.) |
BridgeAR
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2018
the actual and expected arguments in assert.strictEqual() calls are in the wrong order. Any literal value should be the second argument while the first argument should be the value returned by a function/be the calculated value. PR-URL: #24151 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
kiyomizumia
pushed a commit
to kiyomizumia/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2018
the actual and expected arguments in assert.strictEqual() calls are in the wrong order. Any literal value should be the second argument while the first argument should be the value returned by a function/be the calculated value. PR-URL: nodejs#24151 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
This was referenced Nov 15, 2018
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2018
the actual and expected arguments in assert.strictEqual() calls are in the wrong order. Any literal value should be the second argument while the first argument should be the value returned by a function/be the calculated value. PR-URL: #24151 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 26, 2018
the actual and expected arguments in assert.strictEqual() calls are in the wrong order. Any literal value should be the second argument while the first argument should be the value returned by a function/be the calculated value. PR-URL: #24151 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Merged
This was referenced Jan 29, 2019
This was referenced Jan 29, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
code-and-learn
Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events.
test
Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the actual and expected arguments in assert.strictEqual() calls are in
the wrong order. Any literal value should be the second argument while
the first argument should be the value returned by a function/be the
calculated value.
@jasnell: LGTM
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes