-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
util: add colorText method #43371
util: add colorText method #43371
Conversation
26f5680
to
7556c9e
Compare
Name sounds good to me; i don't think it should be in Is there any way to have tests that actually verify that the expected colors show up on supported platforms? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left some preliminary comments.
Is there any way to have tests that actually verify that the expected colors show up on supported platforms?
test/parallel/test-util-format.js
and test/parallel/test-util-inspect.js
might be good places to look for examples.
Also cc @BridgeAR who might be interested since this overlaps with the color support in util.inspect()
.
function colorText(format, text) { | ||
validateString(format, 'format'); | ||
validateString(text, 'text'); | ||
const formatCodes = inspect.colors[format]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is going to be public API, we should probably provide some additional validation for supported format
s.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
additional validation
like?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking we could validate that format
is actually something supported by inspect.colors
, but feel free to ignore if you want.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If they pass anything apart as of now, we are just returning the text as in, do you feel it makes sense to check if the format
is supported by inspect.colors
and throw an error for non-supported inputs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's what I originally meant.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is inspect.colors
mutable and exposed to users?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
^ yes!
9c94ffe
to
9ac1a84
Compare
Micro-nit on the commit message: The verb in the first line of the commit message should be imperative. In other words, |
9ac1a84
to
7cd400f
Compare
Thanks for the clarification @Trott. I had that doubt, fixed it. |
We should also add this to the |
Yes, this would require a docs update. |
01a77c8
to
ccfdcee
Compare
ccfdcee
to
9da85fe
Compare
Is this ready enough? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left a few comments. It would be good for others to weigh in on things like the overall API design and whether or not we should make this experimental first.
doc/api/util.md
Outdated
added: v18.3.0 | ||
--> | ||
|
||
* `format` {string} `format` one of the color format from `util.inspect.colors` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should probably link util.inspect.colors
to https://nodejs.org/api/util.html#customizing-utilinspect-colors.
Takes `format` and `text` and retuns the colored text form | ||
|
||
```js | ||
const util = require('node:util'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you remove this line. Otherwise we'll need to show the same example code for CJS and ESM.
const util = require('node:util'); | ||
|
||
console.log(util.colorText('red', 'This text shall be in red color')); | ||
// ^ '\u001b[31mThis text shall be in red color\u001b[39m' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// ^ '\u001b[31mThis text shall be in red color\u001b[39m' | |
// ^ '\u001b[31mThis text shall be colored red\u001b[39m' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
s/shall be/is?
function colorText(format, text) { | ||
validateString(format, 'format'); | ||
validateString(text, 'text'); | ||
const formatCodes = inspect.colors[format]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's what I originally meant.
assert.throws(() => { | ||
util.colorText('red', undefined); | ||
}, { | ||
code: 'ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE', | ||
message: 'The "text" argument must be of type string. Received undefined' | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't this already be tested on line 20 when invalidOption
is undefined
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, this should rather be util.colorText(undefined, undefined);
const util = require('node:util'); | ||
|
||
console.log(util.colorText('red', 'This text shall be in red color')); | ||
// ^ '\u001b[31mThis text shall be in red color\u001b[39m' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
s/shall be/is?
function colorText(format, text) { | ||
validateString(format, 'format'); | ||
validateString(text, 'text'); | ||
const formatCodes = inspect.colors[format]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is inspect.colors
mutable and exposed to users?
Co-authored-by: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Harband <ljharb@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am hesitant to add new formatting functionalities to util
(console
does not seem ideal either). I just opened a something similar API: #43523. It does a bit more by also allowing nested colors, this functionality here does not do that (e.g., colorText('green', 'green ' + colorText('red', 'red') + ' green')
would end up being colored: green red defaultColor
instead of green red green
).
Let's throw this into the TSC agenda as part of the discussion for #43523 |
Dropping it from the tsc-agenda until #43382 is resolved. |
added: REPLACEME | ||
--> | ||
|
||
* `format` {string} A color format defined in `util.inspect.colors`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Accepting string | string[]
would be really helpful to e.g. make text both a certain color and underline/italic/bold/... at the same time
Superseded by #51850 |
This is with reference to the comment in #42770
A few things to finalize before completing this draft PR:
console
API?//cc @nodejs/util