-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: remove Legacy status from querystring #44912
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
I'm not able to check who moved that API to Legacy but we should probably ping them. |
I'm in favor of removing legacy and improving querystring module performance. |
It was @jasnell in 32ade6997ba. |
I'm -0 on this. I don't see much justification. Legacy status doesn't mean we can't take improvements at all. Won't block tho. |
@jasnell if it doesn't mean it can't be improved, and it doesn't mean there are strong reasons not to use it in the new code, then what does it even mean? |
@targos yeah that's why I'm not blocking :-) @kibertoad ... It means there is a standard API alternative available that is preferred, which for me (at least) counts as a strong reason not to use it. |
@jasnell but can it be called a clearly preferred alternative? it is both slower and handles significantly less cases. it's basically a glorified toString |
@kibertoad ... We are all welcomed to our own opinions. I did clearly state that mine was non-blocking. I think legacy status is better here and legacy doesn't mean that continued improvement cannot be made. |
Landed in c163bf9 |
Closes: #44911 PR-URL: #44912 Fixes: #44911 Reviewed-By: Erick Wendel <erick.workspace@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Closes: #44911