Skip to content

Conversation

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 commented Feb 10, 2025

Most those test have either been fixed in a semver-minor way on later release lines, or seems to not affect the other release lines for another reason.

@aduh95 aduh95 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 10, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. v18.x Issues that can be reproduced on v18.x or PRs targeting the v18.x-staging branch. labels Feb 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 10, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95 aduh95 added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label Feb 11, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @aduh95. Please 👍 to approve.

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduh95 commented Feb 11, 2025

Looks like the test is still failing, meaning it's not skipped at all, not sure why 🤔

@marco-ippolito
Copy link
Member

marco-ippolito commented Feb 11, 2025

I think you edited parallel.status but the test is in sequential, so you need to change the sequential.status

@aduh95 aduh95 added request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Feb 11, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 11, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@richardlau
Copy link
Member

FWIW test also failed on macOS 13: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-osx/63642/nodes=osx13-x64/testReport/junit/(root)/sequential/test_perf_hooks/

@aduh95 aduh95 changed the title [v18.x] test: skip test-perf-hooks on SmartOS [v18.x] test: skip and mark flaky some tests Feb 11, 2025
@aduh95 aduh95 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 11, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 11, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduh95 commented Feb 12, 2025

Any chance I could get the fast-track request approved? #57001 (comment)

Refs: nodejs#57000
PR-URL: nodejs#57001
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Refs: nodejs#54803
PR-URL: nodejs#57001
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Refs: nodejs#34730
PR-URL: nodejs#57001
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#57001
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Refs: nodejs#50046
PR-URL: nodejs#57001
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
@aduh95 aduh95 force-pushed the skip-test-perf-hook-smartos branch from 4d3f0bb to 06c523d Compare February 12, 2025 13:46
@aduh95 aduh95 merged commit 06c523d into nodejs:v18.x-staging Feb 12, 2025
18 of 20 checks passed
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduh95 commented Feb 12, 2025

Landed in 8b8c9a2...06c523d

@aduh95 aduh95 deleted the skip-test-perf-hook-smartos branch February 12, 2025 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. v18.x Issues that can be reproduced on v18.x or PRs targeting the v18.x-staging branch.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants