Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Package bastet.1.2.0 #16057

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2020
Merged

Conversation

Risto-Stevcev
Copy link
Contributor

bastet.1.2.0

A ReasonML/OCaml library for category theory and abstract algebra



🐫 Pull-request generated by opam-publish v2.0.2

@anuragsoni
Copy link
Contributor

This is failing with the same issue as #16058 (related to bisect_ppx)

Relevent portions from bisect's readme that I had missed earlier:

For releasing, you have two options:
If you don't want a dependency on package bisect_ppx, you have to manually remove (preprocess (pps bisect_ppx)) from your dune files.
If a dependency on Bisect_ppx is okay, you don't have to do anything. A regular build command, without BISECT_ENABLE=yes will produce uninstrumented code:

@aantron
Copy link
Contributor

aantron commented Mar 23, 2020

FYI I will document a third option shortly, aantron/bisect_ppx#294, which might be a bit less annoying. I've used it previously in Lwt and odoc uses it now, but I have an idea for how to make it less ugly than it was in Lwt and is now in odoc :)

@camelus
Copy link
Contributor

camelus commented Mar 23, 2020

Commit: 58af062

@Risto-Stevcev has posted 4 contributions.

☀️ All lint checks passed 58af062
  • These packages passed lint tests: bastet.1.2.0

☀️ Installability check (+1)
  • new installable packages (1): bastet.1.2.0

@aantron
Copy link
Contributor

aantron commented Mar 23, 2020

@Risto-Stevcev Risto-Stevcev force-pushed the opam-publish-bastet.1.2.0 branch from 58af062 to 7fa2160 Compare March 23, 2020 11:03
@kit-ty-kate
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@kit-ty-kate kit-ty-kate merged commit 3232bf7 into ocaml:master Mar 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants