Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating current-law policy for TCJA #1787

Closed
siervicul opened this issue Dec 21, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Updating current-law policy for TCJA #1787

siervicul opened this issue Dec 21, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@siervicul
Copy link

siervicul commented Dec 21, 2017

Since the TCJA becoming law is imminent, is there a plan for making its provisions the new defaults for Tax-Calculator?

In the meantime, for TaxBrain users I would suggest adding TCJA presets to the list of presets on the TaxBrain main page (after all, it would seem to be more newsworthy at this point than any of the proposals currently listed there).

@martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator

@siervicul, I'm going to move the second part of your question in #1787 to the PolicyBrain repository issue list so that TaxBrain developers can see it. My understanding is that they are currently working on making a TaxBrain preset for TCJA.

@martinholmer martinholmer changed the title TCJA implementation? Will TCJA become the new current-law policy? Dec 21, 2017
@martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator

@siervicul asked in issue #1787:

Since the TCJA becoming law is imminent, is there a plan for making its provisions the new defaults for Tax-Calculator?

I'm working under the assumption that the current_law_policy.json file will be changed in the near future so that it projects forward the policy in the TCJA conference committee bill.

Is that the plan? Any discussion of alternative approaches?

@MattHJensen @feenberg @Amy-Xu @andersonfrailey @hdoupe @GoFroggyRun @codykallen

@MattHJensen
Copy link
Contributor

I'm working under the assumption that the current_law_policy.json file will be changed in the near future so that it projects forward the policy in the TCJA conference committee bill.

This is what I've had in mind, too. current_law_policy.json defaults are updated to reflect the new current_law_policy.json and a reform file is available to take users back to 2017_policy.

@codykallen
Copy link
Contributor

@MattHJensen said:

current_law_policy.json defaults are updated to reflect the new current_law_policy.json and a reform file is available to take users back to 2017_policy.

Before we actually update it, I would appreciate if a few people (myself included) could do a thorough reading of the bill and discussion to ensure that we have accurately modeled every possible provision. There are a lot of changes, and it's certainly possible I missed something while making the JSON.

@MattHJensen
Copy link
Contributor

A couple of related notes for the update:

  • We need to review and update the reform files. Some reforms that are meant to specify new tax systems will no longer be accurate with the new baseline. For example, RyanBrady.json will either need to be updated or we will need to note that the RyanBrady.json file is only accurate in conjunction with a 2017_policy baseline.

  • Until TaxData adopts a post-TCJA CBO Budget Outlook (likely published in February), we should note to users that the Tax-Calculator+TaxData baseline does not account for behavioral changes that are likely to result from TCJA. (Alternatively, we could do a stage 3 adjustment to account for anticipated behavioral changes, but that would be a significant amount of work and would require the TaxData project to take a stance on behavioral elasticities....I think it is better to wait for the new CBO baseline.)

@MattHJensen MattHJensen changed the title Will TCJA become the new current-law policy? Updating current-law policy for TCJA Dec 29, 2017
@martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator

The merge of pull request #1803 resolves issue #1787.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants