[exporter/kinetica] mark Unmaintained #36808
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
atoulme
approved these changes
Dec 12, 2024
|
@TylerHelmuth @atoulme We at Kinetica are certainly interested in maintaining the exporter component and contributing updates and fixes to it. We were off track for some time but do plans around it. What do we have to do ? Thanks. |
|
@am-kinetica please follow these instructions to become of the open telemetry org and then you can be a code owner again. |
sbylica-splunk
pushed a commit
to sbylica-splunk/opentelemetry-collector-contrib
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
#### Description This exporter was added as a vendor-specific component via open-telemetry#24294. It [no longer has its vendor sponsor as a code owner](open-telemetry#36229). Following our [Unmaintained guidelines](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/docs/component-stability.md#unmaintained), this component is now considered unmaintained. @am-kinetica @kyle-sutton please respond if Kinetica is interested in continuing to maintain this component.
mterhar
pushed a commit
to mterhar/opentelemetry-collector-contrib
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2024
#### Description This exporter was added as a vendor-specific component via open-telemetry#24294. It [no longer has its vendor sponsor as a code owner](open-telemetry#36229). Following our [Unmaintained guidelines](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/docs/component-stability.md#unmaintained), this component is now considered unmaintained. @am-kinetica @kyle-sutton please respond if Kinetica is interested in continuing to maintain this component.
AkhigbeEromo
pushed a commit
to sematext/opentelemetry-collector-contrib
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
#### Description This exporter was added as a vendor-specific component via open-telemetry#24294. It [no longer has its vendor sponsor as a code owner](open-telemetry#36229). Following our [Unmaintained guidelines](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/docs/component-stability.md#unmaintained), this component is now considered unmaintained. @am-kinetica @kyle-sutton please respond if Kinetica is interested in continuing to maintain this component.
zeck-ops
pushed a commit
to zeck-ops/opentelemetry-collector-contrib
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2025
#### Description This exporter was added as a vendor-specific component via open-telemetry#24294. It [no longer has its vendor sponsor as a code owner](open-telemetry#36229). Following our [Unmaintained guidelines](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/docs/component-stability.md#unmaintained), this component is now considered unmaintained. @am-kinetica @kyle-sutton please respond if Kinetica is interested in continuing to maintain this component.
|
@TylerHelmuth - I think I have already become a member. What do I need to do to remove the |
|
@am-kinetica please open a PR to change its status |
atoulme
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2025
<!--Ex. Fixing a bug - Describe the bug and how this fixes the issue. Ex. Adding a feature - Explain what this achieves.--> #### Description By definition, the [unmaintained status](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/docs/component-stability.md#unmaintained) means that the component "does not have an active code owner." This PR moves code owners of two components (the `kinetica` and `opensearch` exporters) to emeritus. `exporter/kinetica`: @TylerHelmuth was listed as the active code owner, but [moved the exporter to unmaintained](#36808). `exporter/opensearch`: This component was marked unmaintained as a part of #35781. It looks like there's an effort to add new code owners (which is great to see), but that does not include @Aneurysm9, the user currently listed as the code owner. _This PR also adds the `seeking_new: true` flag to all unmaintained components as per the [documentation](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/docs/component-stability.md#unmaintained), "Components that are unmaintained are actively seeking contributors to become code owners."._ The reason for this change is the listed code owners in component READMEs do not match the `.github/CODEOWNERS` file. This is because the build tool generating the CODEOWNERS file [does not check for code owners of unmaintained components](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-build-tools/blob/6bdbad9c2432ef2c34105a2c65357ffa2d86666d/githubgen/codeowners.go#L48). This follows the definition of unmaintained so I believe we should follow the definition here rather than modify the build tool. _Credit to @pjanotti for pointing out this discrepancy_
seongpil0948
pushed a commit
to seongpil0948/opentelemetry-collector-contrib
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2025
) <!--Ex. Fixing a bug - Describe the bug and how this fixes the issue. Ex. Adding a feature - Explain what this achieves.--> #### Description By definition, the [unmaintained status](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/docs/component-stability.md#unmaintained) means that the component "does not have an active code owner." This PR moves code owners of two components (the `kinetica` and `opensearch` exporters) to emeritus. `exporter/kinetica`: @TylerHelmuth was listed as the active code owner, but [moved the exporter to unmaintained](open-telemetry#36808). `exporter/opensearch`: This component was marked unmaintained as a part of open-telemetry#35781. It looks like there's an effort to add new code owners (which is great to see), but that does not include @Aneurysm9, the user currently listed as the code owner. _This PR also adds the `seeking_new: true` flag to all unmaintained components as per the [documentation](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/docs/component-stability.md#unmaintained), "Components that are unmaintained are actively seeking contributors to become code owners."._ The reason for this change is the listed code owners in component READMEs do not match the `.github/CODEOWNERS` file. This is because the build tool generating the CODEOWNERS file [does not check for code owners of unmaintained components](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-build-tools/blob/6bdbad9c2432ef2c34105a2c65357ffa2d86666d/githubgen/codeowners.go#L48). This follows the definition of unmaintained so I believe we should follow the definition here rather than modify the build tool. _Credit to @pjanotti for pointing out this discrepancy_
johnleslie
pushed a commit
to johnleslie/opentelemetry-collector-contrib
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2025
) <!--Ex. Fixing a bug - Describe the bug and how this fixes the issue. Ex. Adding a feature - Explain what this achieves.--> #### Description By definition, the [unmaintained status](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/docs/component-stability.md#unmaintained) means that the component "does not have an active code owner." This PR moves code owners of two components (the `kinetica` and `opensearch` exporters) to emeritus. `exporter/kinetica`: @TylerHelmuth was listed as the active code owner, but [moved the exporter to unmaintained](open-telemetry#36808). `exporter/opensearch`: This component was marked unmaintained as a part of open-telemetry#35781. It looks like there's an effort to add new code owners (which is great to see), but that does not include @Aneurysm9, the user currently listed as the code owner. _This PR also adds the `seeking_new: true` flag to all unmaintained components as per the [documentation](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/docs/component-stability.md#unmaintained), "Components that are unmaintained are actively seeking contributors to become code owners."._ The reason for this change is the listed code owners in component READMEs do not match the `.github/CODEOWNERS` file. This is because the build tool generating the CODEOWNERS file [does not check for code owners of unmaintained components](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-build-tools/blob/6bdbad9c2432ef2c34105a2c65357ffa2d86666d/githubgen/codeowners.go#L48). This follows the definition of unmaintained so I believe we should follow the definition here rather than modify the build tool. _Credit to @pjanotti for pointing out this discrepancy_
johnleslie
pushed a commit
to johnleslie/opentelemetry-collector-contrib
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2025
) <!--Ex. Fixing a bug - Describe the bug and how this fixes the issue. Ex. Adding a feature - Explain what this achieves.--> #### Description By definition, the [unmaintained status](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/docs/component-stability.md#unmaintained) means that the component "does not have an active code owner." This PR moves code owners of two components (the `kinetica` and `opensearch` exporters) to emeritus. `exporter/kinetica`: @TylerHelmuth was listed as the active code owner, but [moved the exporter to unmaintained](open-telemetry#36808). `exporter/opensearch`: This component was marked unmaintained as a part of open-telemetry#35781. It looks like there's an effort to add new code owners (which is great to see), but that does not include @Aneurysm9, the user currently listed as the code owner. _This PR also adds the `seeking_new: true` flag to all unmaintained components as per the [documentation](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/blob/main/docs/component-stability.md#unmaintained), "Components that are unmaintained are actively seeking contributors to become code owners."._ The reason for this change is the listed code owners in component READMEs do not match the `.github/CODEOWNERS` file. This is because the build tool generating the CODEOWNERS file [does not check for code owners of unmaintained components](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-build-tools/blob/6bdbad9c2432ef2c34105a2c65357ffa2d86666d/githubgen/codeowners.go#L48). This follows the definition of unmaintained so I believe we should follow the definition here rather than modify the build tool. _Credit to @pjanotti for pointing out this discrepancy_
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This exporter was added as a vendor-specific component via #24294. It no longer has its vendor sponsor as a code owner.
Following our Unmaintained guidelines, this component is now considered unmaintained.
@am-kinetica @kyle-sutton please respond if Kinetica is interested in continuing to maintain this component.