[PRE REVIEW]: Linopy: Linear optimization with n-dimensional labeled variables

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @FabianHofmann (Fabian Hofmann)
Repository: https://github.com/PyPSA/linopy
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: v0.0.11
Editor: @Fei-Tao
Reviewers: @torressa, @g4brielvs
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1cb9253438483e4d336508d9a26646f7"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1cb9253438483e4d336508d9a26646f7/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1cb9253438483e4d336508d9a26646f7/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1cb9253438483e4d336508d9a26646f7)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @FabianHofmann. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@FabianHofmann if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.10 s (667.0 files/s, 114650.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          37           1537           1749           3946
TeX                              1             39              0            435
reStructuredText                 7            198            171            306
Jupyter Notebook                 7              0           2103            194
YAML                             5             19              6            149
Markdown                         3             52              0             94
CSS                              1             13              3             54
Julia                            1              6              1             37
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
TOML                             1              1              0              4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            65           1877           4041           5254
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1261

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.3390/pr6080106 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.188 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.1208706 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.6478312 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4613-0215-5_8 is OK
- 10.7249/R366 is OK
- 10.1137/15M1020575 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.6522795 is OK
- 10.1287/mnsc.36.5.519 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117377 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-58821-6 is OK
- 10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.012 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.148 is OK
- 10.1007/s12532-017-0130-5 is OK
- 10.1016/0041-5553(80)90061-0 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cor.2019.104807 is OK
- 10.1145/2490257.2490283 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.3509134 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.063 is OK
- 10.1109/38.56302 is OK
- 10.2307/2344013 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.7249/r366 may be a valid DOI for title: Linear Programming and Extensions
- 10.1007/978-1-4613-0215-5_8 may be a valid DOI for title: General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS)

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[FabianHofmann]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @FabianHofmann, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[FabianHofmann]

Possible reviewers:

• matbesancon
• mskwark
• torressa
• e-dub
• bleyerj
• mvaldes
• mewilhel
• brynpickering

[Fei-Tao]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @Fei-Tao is now the editor

[Fei-Tao]

Hi @matbesancon @mskwark @torressa @e-dub @bleyerj @mvaldes @mewilhel @brynpickering @duhd1993, if you'd like to review this submission, please comment here! Feel free to unsubscribe from this issue if you are not interested.

[torressa]

Thanks @Fei-Tao! Happy to review, seems super cool work!

[Fei-Tao]

@torressa great! thanks for agreeing to review this submission.

[Fei-Tao]

@editorialbot assign @torressa as reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[Fei-Tao]

@editorialbot add @torressa as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@torressa added to the reviewers list!

[Fei-Tao]

Hi @g4brielvs @jmadera @jakobbossek @GuillaumeDerval @sixpearls, if you'd like to review this submission, please comment here! Feel free to unsubscribe from this issue if you are not interested. Thank you for your time.

[g4brielvs]

@Fei-Tao Thank you! I'm interested to review the submission and I should be able to do so in the next 5-7 days.

[Fei-Tao]

@g4brielvs Great! I will add you to the reviewer list and start the reviewing process. Thank you for your quick response!

[Fei-Tao]

@editorialbot add @g4brielvs as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@g4brielvs added to the reviewers list!

[Fei-Tao]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #4823.

[Fei-Tao]

Thanks everyone! Looking forward to your reviews at #4823.