[PRE REVIEW]: cosasi: Graph Diffusion Source Inference in Python

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @lucasmccabe (Lucas McCabe)
Repository: https://github.com/lmiconsulting/cosasi/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: 0.0.2
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @sara-02, @zoometh
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2d7b627bb3db796bbd125853bee6e3fb"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2d7b627bb3db796bbd125853bee6e3fb/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2d7b627bb3db796bbd125853bee6e3fb/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/2d7b627bb3db796bbd125853bee6e3fb)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @lucasmccabe. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@lucasmccabe if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: https://github.com/lmiconsulting/cosasi/tree/joss/

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: https://github.com/lmiconsulting/cosasi/tree/joss/

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[lucasmccabe]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @lucasmccabe, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[lucasmccabe]

@editorialbot set joss as branch

[editorialbot]

Done! branch is now joss

[lucasmccabe]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[lucasmccabe]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.4456181 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1109/tit.2011.2158885 may be a valid DOI for title: Rumors in a network: Who’s the culprit?
- 10.1007/s10618-015-0435-9 may be a valid DOI for title: Locating the contagion source in networks with partial timestamps
- 10.1109/ita.2013.6502991 may be a valid DOI for title: Information source detection in the SIR model: A sample-path-based approach
- 10.1109/icdm.2012.136 may be a valid DOI for title: Spotting culprits in epidemics: How many and which ones?
- 10.1016/j.softx.2021.100675 may be a valid DOI for title: OONIS—Object-oriented network infection simulator
- 10.21105/joss.01731 may be a valid DOI for title: Eon (epidemics on networks): a fast, flexible python package for simulation, analytic approximation, and analysis of epidemics on networks
- 10.1007/s11222-007-9033-z may be a valid DOI for title: A tutorial on spectral clustering

INVALID DOIs

- None

[lucasmccabe]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/tit.2011.2158885 is OK
- 10.1007/s10618-015-0435-9 is OK
- 10.1109/ita.2013.6502991 is OK
- 10.1109/icdm.2012.136 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-031-79285-4 is OK
- 10.1016/j.softx.2022.100988 is OK
- 10.1016/j.softx.2021.100675 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01731 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4456181 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v084.i08 is OK
- 10.1007/s11222-007-9033-z is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[lucasmccabe]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[lucasmccabe]

Hello - per @editorialbot's request, I suggest the following potential reviewers from the provided list:

• jonjoncardoso
• zoometh
• vc1492a
• leotrs
• akbaritabar
• ajgates42
• p-ortmann
• manmeetkaurbaxi
• sgeorge91
• gabett
• papachristoumarios
• jGaboardi
• dinacmistry
• sdmccabe (FYSA: no relation)
• rodogi
• nick-gauthier

Thank you for your time and consideration!

[lucasmccabe]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.09 s (984.5 files/s, 62785.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          39            538           1246           2257
reStructuredText                38            344            139            403
TeX                              1             11              0            120
JSON                             1              0              0            106
Markdown                         2             64              0            105
YAML                             2              1              4             28
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            85            970           1397           3054
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1008

[arfon]

@lucasmccabe - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[lucasmccabe]

@arfon Got it. Thank you for the update!

[danielskatz]

@lucasmccabe - I want to let you know that JOSS has now switched to a track-based model of editors, and since this is in the track I'm leading (Computer Science, Information Science, and Mathematics). I'll be keeping an eye on it and looking for an available editor

[lucasmccabe]

@danielskatz - OK, Thank you for the update. I appreciate your help.

[lucasmccabe]

@editorialbot set 0.0.2 as version

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry @lucasmccabe, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.

[lucasmccabe]

I'm sorry @lucasmccabe, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's something only editors are allowed to do.

@danielskatz - Would it be possible to set the version to 0.0.2? A few updates were made since the initial submission. Thank you!

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot set 0.0.2 as version

[editorialbot]

Done! version is now 0.0.2

[danielskatz]

@lucasmccabe - We still don't have any of exactly the right editors with availability, so I'm going to edit this

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @danielskatz is now the editor

[danielskatz]

👋 @jonjoncardoso, @zoometh, @vc1492a - would two of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[sara-02]

@danielskatz If possible, from mid-Nov, I can take this review. I have been working with the epidemic modeling library NDlib for some of my work, so I am familiar with the terminologies of this project.

[danielskatz]

👋 @sara-02 - thanks, that sounds reasonable. If I forget and prompt you sooner than that, please remind my of your schedule

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot add @sara-02 as reviewer

Note: we won't start the review process until we find at least one more reviewer

[editorialbot]

@sara-02 added to the reviewers list!

[zoometh]

It is fine for me. I'll start the review in a week or so.

[lucasmccabe]

@danielskatz @sara-02 @zoometh - Thank you all for your help! I look forward to the process.

[danielskatz]

Thanks @zoometh - I'll add you and start the review issue now, though I recognize that neither reviewer will start immediately.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot add @zoometh as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@zoometh added to the reviewers list!

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #4894.

[jonjoncardoso]

👋 @jonjoncardoso, @zoometh, @vc1492a - would two of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

Unfortunately, I won't have time this time