[PRE REVIEW]: PyPO: a Python package for Physical Optics

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @arend95 (Arend Moerman)
Repository: https://github.com/PyPO-dev/PyPO
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @MikeHughesKent, @brandondube
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/baa668ad384488715dbfb1a540fb67fd"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/baa668ad384488715dbfb1a540fb67fd/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/baa668ad384488715dbfb1a540fb67fd/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/baa668ad384488715dbfb1a540fb67fd)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @arend95. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@arend95 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.13 s (633.2 files/s, 174201.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          53           2605           2635           8141
C/C++ Header                    15            781           1422           2738
CUDA                             2            411            701           1240
C++                              4            246            661            776
Markdown                         5             23              0            154
CSS                              1              7              3            119
TeX                              1              7              0             93
CMake                            1             16              1             33
YAML                             1              1              4             18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            83           4097           5427          13312
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 630

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/s10909-022-02888-5 is OK
- 10.1117/12.551391 is OK
- 10.1117/12.925230 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01352 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @arend95, we'll use this pre-review issue to assign an editor and find reviewers - and also fix any initial issues with the submission.

Can you change the affiliation for the coauthor with multiple from [1,2] to "1, 2"?

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @danielskatz as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @danielskatz is now the editor

[danielskatz]

@arend95 - once the paper compiles, we can start looking for reviewers.

Please follow the example paper and note that you can click on the error above to find out more about it. Please feel free to make changes to your .md file, then use the command @editorialbot generate pdf to make a new PDF. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment.

[arendMoerman]

Hi all, thanks for pointing out this mistake!

[arendMoerman]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[danielskatz]

👋 @alvesjnr, @MikeHughesKent, @brandondube, @aquilesC, @DiegoJRR - would a couple of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

[MikeHughesKent]

@danielskatz Yes I can take a look at this one.

[danielskatz]

Thanks @MikeHughesKent - I'll add you to the system, but we won't start the review until we get at least one more reviewer as well.

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot add @MikeHughesKent as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@MikeHughesKent added to the reviewers list!

[brandondube]

Yes, I can perform a review

[danielskatz]

Thanks @brandondube - I'll add you, and see if anyone else wants to join, then start the review tomorrow either way

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot add @brandondube as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@brandondube added to the reviewers list!

[danielskatz]

ok, let's go ahead and get started

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5478.

[alvesjnr]

Hi,

I'm sorry but I don't have the bandwidth at the moment to review.

If the review extend past the next two weeks (05/Jun) I can join starting from this date.

[danielskatz]

that's fine - as you saw, we found 2 reviewers which should be enough