-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: PANINIpy: Package of Algorithms for Nonparametric Inference with Networks in Python #7263
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
|
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: PyDGN: a Python Library for Flexible and Reproducible Research on Deep Learning for Graphs PyEI: A Python package for ecological inference cosasi: Graph Diffusion Source Inference in Python HyperNetX: A Python package for modeling complex network data as hypergraphs XGI: A Python package for higher-order interaction networks |
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: PyDGN: a Python Library for Flexible and Reproducible Research on Deep Learning for Graphs PyEI: A Python package for ecological inference cosasi: Graph Diffusion Source Inference in Python HyperNetX: A Python package for modeling complex network data as hypergraphs XGI: A Python package for higher-order interaction networks |
@editorialbot invite @vissarion as editor 👋 @vissarion can you take this one on as editor? |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@editorialbot assign me as editor |
Assigned! @vissarion is now the editor |
Hi @aneeshnaik, @ankurankan, @gchure, @matt-graham, @rafaelorozco would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
@vissarion I would be happy to help with the review. |
@editorialbot add @ankurankan as reviewer |
@ankurankan added to the reviewers list! |
Hi @vissarion, happy to review. I'll be able to finish it in ≈3-4 weeks if that timeline is okay. |
@vissarion will not mind being additional reviewer on this network inference paper. |
I would be happy to review also if you're still looking for additional reviewers. |
@editorialbot add @gchure as reviewer |
@gchure added to the reviewers list! |
@abhishektiwari, @aneeshnaik thank you for your availability! I will let you know if extra reviewers are needed! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #7312. |
Submitting author: @baiyueh (Baiyue He)
Repository: https://github.com/baiyueh/PANINIpy
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0
Editor: @vissarion
Reviewers: @ankurankan, @gchure
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @baiyueh. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@baiyueh if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: