[PRE REVIEW]: Slicer-Liver: A 3D Slicer Extension for Liver Surgery Planning

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @RuoyanMeng (Ruoyan Meng)
Repository: https://github.com/ALive-research/Slicer-Liver
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42810b9efc8c715543ca34e3119a6ce2"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42810b9efc8c715543ca34e3119a6ce2/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42810b9efc8c715543ca34e3119a6ce2/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42810b9efc8c715543ca34e3119a6ce2)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @RuoyanMeng. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@RuoyanMeng if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603033 is OK
- 10.1007/s11548-013-0937-0 is OK
- 10.1007/s00464-010-0915-3 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.03.019 is OK
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3574517/v1 is OK
- 10.2312/vcbm.20231209 is OK
- 10.1007/s00464-022-09493-3 is OK
- 10.1038/s41575-020-0314-8 is OK
- 10.1007/BF01656368 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Visual computing for medicine: theory, algorithms,...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Cancer statistics, 2023
- No DOI given, and none found for title: 3D Slicer Extension Manager User Guide

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.05.018 may be a valid DOI for title: Computer-assisted surgery planning in children wit...
- 10.1097/sla.0b013e31827f171f may be a valid DOI for title: Revisiting liver anatomy and terminology of hepate...
- 10.1007/978-1-4614-7657-3_19 may be a valid DOI for title: 3D Slicer: a platform for subject-specific image a...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.25 s (459.2 files/s, 87179.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C++                             40           1675           1931           6198
Qt                               5              0              0           3111
Python                           4            611            840           2175
C/C++ Header                    35            949           1595           1555
CMake                           21            118            133            474
Markdown                         4             85              0            282
TeX                              1             12              0            153
YAML                             2             10             27             56
INI                              1              7              0             17
SVG                              3              0              2              7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           116           3467           4528          14028
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    71	Rafael Palomar
    69	Ole Vegard Solberg
    59	Geir Arne Tangen
    40	Ruoyan Meng
    20	Gabriella d' Albenzio
    19	Rafael
    12	dalbenzioG
     1	Andras Lasso
     1	Csaba Pinter
     1	James Butler
     1	RuoyanMeng

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1248

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

PlatiPy: Processing Library and Analysis Toolkit for Medical Imaging in Python
Submitting author: @pchlap
Handling editor: @samhforbes (Active)
Reviewers: @agisga, @tomelse
Similarity score: 0.6561

The Vascular Modeling Toolkit: A Python Library for the Analysis of Tubular Structures in Medical Images
Submitting author: @rlizzo
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @wouterpotters, @brainstorm
Similarity score: 0.6395

VaMPy: An Automated and Objective Pipeline for Modeling Vascular Geometries
Submitting author: @hkjeldsberg
Handling editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman (Active)
Reviewers: @stefsmeets, @JaroslavHron, @ctdegroot
Similarity score: 0.6268

Volume Segmantics: A Python Package for Semantic Segmentation of Volumetric Data Using Pre-trained PyTorch Deep Learning
Models
Submitting author: @OllyK
Handling editor: @osorensen (Active)
Reviewers: @jingpengw, @estenhl
Similarity score: 0.6256

open_iA: A tool for processing and visual analysis of industrial computed tomography datasets
Submitting author: @codeling
Handling editor: @katyhuff (Retired)
Reviewers: @trallard, @behollister
Similarity score: 0.6215

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[arfon]

@RuoyanMeng - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!