Skip to content

Conversation

@ashking94
Copy link
Member

@ashking94 ashking94 commented Mar 5, 2025

Description

The check of comparing the max seq no and global checkpoint during bootstrap of ReadOnlyEngine for remote store enabled index is not required since the global checkpoint does not play a role with remote store. With a similar PR (#15990), changes were made to track the global checkpoint that has been updated as part of the successful translog upload to remote store. There are still cases where the global checkpoint appears to be changing locally but not getting updated on remote store.

Check List

  • [ ] Functionality includes testing.
  • [ ] API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • [ ] Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Ashish Singh <ssashish@amazon.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for e2f81ce: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

✅ Gradle check result for e2f81ce: SUCCESS

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72.37%. Comparing base (82bbdfb) to head (e2f81ce).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...va/org/opensearch/index/engine/ReadOnlyEngine.java 0.00% 1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #17521      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     72.59%   72.37%   -0.22%     
+ Complexity    65798    65650     -148     
============================================
  Files          5311     5311              
  Lines        304888   304890       +2     
  Branches      44212    44213       +1     
============================================
- Hits         221323   220674     -649     
- Misses        65501    66168     +667     
+ Partials      18064    18048      -16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gbbafna gbbafna merged commit 342c645 into opensearch-project:main Mar 6, 2025
58 of 60 checks passed
@gbbafna gbbafna added the backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch label Mar 6, 2025
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2025
Signed-off-by: Ashish Singh <ssashish@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit 342c645)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
andrross pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2025
(cherry picked from commit 342c645)

Signed-off-by: Ashish Singh <ssashish@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
vinaykpud pushed a commit to vinaykpud/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2025
…t#17521)

Signed-off-by: Ashish Singh <ssashish@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Krishna Pudyodu <vinkrish.neo@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch skip-changelog

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants