-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Backport 2.x]Add GeoBounds aggregation on GeoShape field type.(#3980) (#4266) #8301
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…3980) (opensearch-project#4266) Enables geo_bounds aggregation to work with geo_shape field types. This enhancement includes: * Addition of Doc values on the GeoShape Field. * Addition of GeoShape ValueSource level code interfaces for accessing the DocValues. * Addition of Missing Value feature in the GeoShape Aggregations. Signed-off-by: Navneet Verma <navneev@amazon.com>
heemin32
requested review from
reta,
anasalkouz,
andrross,
Bukhtawar,
CEHENKLE,
dblock,
gbbafna,
setiah,
kartg,
kotwanikunal,
mch2,
nknize,
owaiskazi19,
Rishikesh1159,
ryanbogan,
saratvemulapalli,
shwetathareja,
dreamer-89,
tlfeng,
VachaShah,
dbwiddis and
sachinpkale
as code owners
June 27, 2023 21:27
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #8301 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 70.54% 70.56% +0.01%
- Complexity 56776 56797 +21
============================================
Files 4706 4714 +8
Lines 269087 269420 +333
Branches 39773 39821 +48
============================================
+ Hits 189836 190105 +269
- Misses 62886 62943 +57
- Partials 16365 16372 +7
|
nknize
approved these changes
Jun 28, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for backporting this!!
nknize
added
feature
New feature or request
backport
PRs or issues specific to backporting features or enhancments
Geospatial
labels
Jun 28, 2023
This was referenced Jun 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
backport
PRs or issues specific to backporting features or enhancments
feature
New feature or request
Geospatial
v2.9.0
'Issues and PRs related to version v2.9.0'
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Enables geo_bounds aggregation to work with geo_shape field types.
This enhancement includes:
* Addition of Doc values on the GeoShape Field.
* Addition of GeoShape ValueSource level code interfaces for accessing the DocValues.
* Addition of Missing Value feature in the GeoShape Aggregations.
Related Issues
Resolves #3980
Check List
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.