-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add the Explanation field containing the document explain details to SearchHit #504
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #504 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 57.26% 57.29% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 315 315
Lines 9823 9823
==========================================
+ Hits 5625 5628 +3
+ Misses 2904 2902 -2
+ Partials 1294 1293 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
Thank you for the PR. Looks good so far. You can run the tests locally by following the steps in the developer guide. |
@Jakob3xD just added one |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@zr-bennettm You will need to sign DCO (git commit -s --amend
and force push) for all your commits, please.
Looks like #506 is fixing CI, rebase after that's merged. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Small nit but looks good.
…SearchHit Signed-off-by: Bennett Mountain <bennettm@ziprecruiter.com>
Signed-off-by: zr-bennettm <165848212+zr-bennettm@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Bennett Mountain <bennettm@ziprecruiter.com>
…inter Signed-off-by: Bennett Mountain <bennettm@ziprecruiter.com>
We release often. Open an issue like "Release v.Next", if you need a release quickly. |
Description
Previously, calling the
Search
function here withExplain
set to true inParams
in theSearchReq
did not add an explanation payload to each document. This pull request fixes that by adding anExplanation
field to theSearchHit
struct.Issues Resolved
This resolves issue 503, which I raised.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.