refactor(ci): convert Python examples to algorithm description #131
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: LiangquanLi930 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
WalkthroughUpdates a CI command guide: renames a workflow step label, replaces separate YAML modification methods with a single "YAML Modification Algorithm" (applies to job and workflow targets), removes explicit Python implementation blocks, and updates examples and prompts to show YAML-focused transformations. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant User
participant Doc as "CI Command Doc"
participant Algo as "YAML Modification Algorithm"
participant VCS as "Repo / Workflow File"
participant PR as "PR / Output"
User->>Doc: Read instructions (steps, examples)
Doc->>Algo: Describe steps to locate `test:` section and deduplicate/insert `- ref: wait`
User->>Algo: Provide target file & timeout preference
Algo->>VCS: Locate `test:` section -> identify last test step
Algo->>VCS: Insert `- ref: wait` (inline or multi-line with timeout & best_effort)
VCS->>PR: Prepare diff / PR message (updated wording)
PR->>User: Return PR link and result summary
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Pre-merge checks and finishing touchesImportant Pre-merge checks failedPlease resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional. ❌ Failed checks (2 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
plugins/ci/commands/add-debug-wait.md(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
plugins/ci/commands/add-debug-wait.md
547-547: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
564-564: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
583-583: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
plugins/ci/commands/add-debug-wait.md (2)
395-442: Excellent consolidation of YAML modification logic.The refactored "YAML Modification Algorithm" is well-structured, preserves all critical constraints (indentation, insertion order, timeout handling with
best_effort), and provides clear before/after examples. This effectively replaces the verbose Python implementation while maintaining technical accuracy and usability.
283-283: Label and reference updates are accurate.The rebrand to "Modify Workflow File" (line 283) better reflects the action, and the cross-references to Step 6's algorithm (lines 292, 329) are correctly placed and consistent.
Also applies to: 292-292, 329-329
Replace detailed Python implementations with concise algorithm description in add-debug-wait YAML modification section. Reduces documentation from ~140 lines to clear step-by-step process with examples.
LiangquanLi930
force-pushed
the
add-debug-wait-adjust-2
branch
from
094012b to
c68afd7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
plugins/ci/commands/add-debug-wait.md (1)
395-442: Excellent consolidation of YAML modification logic.The new unified "YAML Modification Algorithm" (Step 6) effectively replaces the scattered Python implementation details with a clear, language-agnostic algorithm. The before/after examples are concrete and show both timeout scenarios. However, verify one detail:
Line 407 states "Insert before the last test step," but the examples show insertion as the first step in the test section (lines 417-426, 422-435). Clarify whether this should consistently be "before the last step" or clarify the intent—i.e., is the algorithm meant to insert immediately after
test:line for simplicity, or truly before the final test step in multi-step test chains?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
plugins/ci/commands/add-debug-wait.md(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
plugins/ci/commands/add-debug-wait.md (2)
545-590: Past issue resolved: Code blocks now have language identifiers. ✅The previous review flagged missing language identifiers on lines 547, 564, and 583. These are now properly marked as
\``bash`, addressing the markdownlint-cli2 (MD040) violation. The examples are clear and directly reflect the consolidated algorithm—showing command invocation, expected prompts, and before/after YAML transformations.
285-359: Step 5a and 5b labels align with consolidation goal. ✅Both sections now reference "Modify [Job Config | Workflow] File" (lines 285, 322) and delegate to the unified YAML Modification Algorithm in Step 6 (via cross-references on lines 292, 329). This eliminates duplication and clarifies the common pattern. The two scenarios (without/with timeout) are clearly distinguished in each step.
|
I do wonder if instead it would not be better to embed the python script and tell the claude command or skill to use it, to save on both time and token generation |
Thanks for your review! I chose the algorithm approach because:
|
2 participants
What this PR does / why we need it:
Replace detailed Python implementations with concise algorithm description in add-debug-wait YAML modification section. Reduces documentation from ~140 lines to clear step-by-step process with examples.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes
Special notes for your reviewer:
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit