-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1934112: Adds memory usage to the metadata #356
Bug 1934112: Adds memory usage to the metadata #356
Conversation
@0sewa0: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1934112, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I tried it locally and the code change looks good to me as well. Maybe we could do the |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: 0sewa0, tremes The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
@0sewa0: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1934112 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This PR adds 2 new fields to the metadata (
gathers.json
).uptime
: the duration since the start of the first gathermemory_alloc
: the memory allocated at the time of creating the report. (in bytes)Some disclaimers:
memory_alloc
stat wont show the peak memory allocation. Even if we are only talking about the gather cycle, knowing when to measure to get the max usage is impossible so we would need to monitor the entire process, which would more complex without much benefit IMO. The purpose of this field is to be able to notice if over a long period there might be a memory leak.Categories
Sample archive
docs/insights-archive-sample/insights-operator/gathers.json
Documentation
Unit Tests
Privacy
Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.
Changelog
References
none