-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.9] Bug 2017773: Anonymize identity provider attributes in … #527
[release-4.9] Bug 2017773: Anonymize identity provider attributes in … #527
Conversation
…the (openshift#520) * Anonymize identity provider attributes in the authentication.operator.openshift.io definition * More robust way....
@tremes: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2017773, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
/bugzilla refresh |
@tremes: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2017773, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (dmisharo@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rluders, tremes The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
11 similar comments
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/lgtm |
/cherry-pick-approved |
/cherry-pick release-4.8 |
@tremes: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.8 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[patch-manager] @quarckster you're configured in the prow config to approve but you need to issue the command |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/override ci/prow/lint |
@rluders: Overrode contexts on behalf of rluders: ci/prow/lint In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@tremes: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2017773 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@tremes: new pull request created: #539 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
…the (openshift#520) (openshift#527) * Anonymize identity provider attributes in the authentication.operator.openshift.io definition * More robust way....
…the (openshift#520) (openshift#527) (openshift#541) * Anonymize identity provider attributes in the authentication.operator.openshift.io definition * More robust way....
…the (#520)
Backport of #520
Categories
Sample Archive
No new data
Documentation
No new doc
Unit Tests
No new test
Privacy
Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.
Changelog
Breaking Changes
No
References
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/???
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017773
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/???