Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: adds codecov #778

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 27, 2023

Conversation

rluders
Copy link
Contributor

@rluders rluders commented May 16, 2023

This PR adds the codecov to the repository.

Categories

  • Bugfix
  • Data Enhancement
  • Feature
  • Backporting
  • Others (CI, Infrastructure, Documentation)

Sample Archive

N/A

Documentation

N/A

Unit Tests

N/A

Privacy

N/A

Changelog

Breaking Changes

No

References

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-10925

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 16, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 16, 2023

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 16, 2023
@rluders rluders marked this pull request as ready for review May 17, 2023 07:43
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 17, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from rhrmo and tremes May 17, 2023 07:43
.codecov.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
.codecov.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor

tremes commented May 29, 2023

/lgtm
/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/override ci/prow/e2e
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 29, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 29, 2023

@tremes: Overrode contexts on behalf of tremes: ci/prow/e2e, ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade, ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

In response to this:

/lgtm
/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/override ci/prow/e2e
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor

tremes commented Jun 6, 2023

/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor

tremes commented Jun 6, 2023

/test insights-operator-e2e-tests

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 6, 2023

@tremes: Overrode contexts on behalf of tremes: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@ncaak ncaak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 9, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ncaak, rluders

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c0f05d3 and 2 for PR HEAD f508926 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 19, 2023

@rluders: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • lint

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • ci/prow/e2e
  • ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade
  • ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview
  • ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • ci/prow/images
  • ci/prow/insights-operator-e2e-tests
  • ci/prow/lint
  • ci/prow/unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-insights-operator-master-e2e
  • pull-ci-openshift-insights-operator-master-e2e-agnostic-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-insights-operator-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview
  • pull-ci-openshift-insights-operator-master-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • pull-ci-openshift-insights-operator-master-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-insights-operator-master-insights-operator-e2e-tests
  • pull-ci-openshift-insights-operator-master-lint
  • pull-ci-openshift-insights-operator-master-unit
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

In response to this:

/override lint

Lint is failing for other reasons, not 'cause of the changes on this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rluders
Copy link
Contributor Author

rluders commented Jun 19, 2023

/override ci/prow/lint

Lint is failing for other reasons, not 'cause of the changes on this PR.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 19, 2023

@rluders: Overrode contexts on behalf of rluders: ci/prow/lint

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/lint

Lint is failing for other reasons, not 'cause of the changes on this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD bb72dd0 and 1 for PR HEAD f508926 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD cd80172 and 0 for PR HEAD f508926 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

Revision f508926 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 23, 2023
@rluders
Copy link
Contributor Author

rluders commented Jun 26, 2023

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 26, 2023
@rluders
Copy link
Contributor Author

rluders commented Jun 26, 2023

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b69cebd and 2 for PR HEAD f508926 in total

@rluders
Copy link
Contributor Author

rluders commented Jun 27, 2023

/override ci/prow/lint

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2023

@rluders: Overrode contexts on behalf of rluders: ci/prow/lint

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/lint

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2023

@rluders: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 11a2ad7 into openshift:master Jun 27, 2023
JoaoFula pushed a commit to JoaoFula/insights-operator that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
* chore: adding codecov report

* chore: format yaml and yml

* chore: change coverage range
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants