Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 1805940: Insights operator does not require being in an openshift run-level to function #78

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2020

Conversation

smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Insights should follow normal admission control rules for a cluster.

Insights should follow normal admission control rules for a cluster.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 20, 2020
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@smarterclayton: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.4 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 20, 2020
@alexandrevicenzi
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexandrevicenzi, smarterclayton

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [alexandrevicenzi,smarterclayton]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@smarterclayton: new pull request created: #79

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.3

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@smarterclayton: new pull request created: #80

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@smarterclayton smarterclayton changed the title manifests: Remove run-level, insights operator does not need it Bug 1805940: Remove run-level, insights operator does not need it Feb 21, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@smarterclayton: Bugzilla bug 1805940 is in an unrecognized state (MODIFIED) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1805940: Remove run-level, insights operator does not need it

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@smarterclayton smarterclayton changed the title Bug 1805940: Remove run-level, insights operator does not need it Bug 1805940: Insights operator does not require being in an openshift run-level to function Feb 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants