Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NO-JIRA: increase number of query attempts to the processing status endpoint i… #873

Merged

Conversation

tremes
Copy link
Contributor

@tremes tremes commented Nov 29, 2023

…n techpreview

This PR implements a new data enhancement to...

Categories

  • Bugfix
  • Data Enhancement
  • Feature
  • Backporting
  • Others (CI, Infrastructure, Documentation)

Sample Archive

  • path/to/sample_data.json

Documentation

  • path/to/documentation.md

Unit Tests

  • path/to/file_test.go

Privacy

Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.

Changelog

Breaking Changes

Yes/No

References

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/???
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/???

@tremes tremes changed the title increate number of query attempts to the processing status endpoint i… increase number of query attempts to the processing status endpoint i… Nov 29, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ncaak and rluders November 29, 2023 13:48
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 29, 2023
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Nov 29, 2023

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 29, 2023

@tremes: Overrode contexts on behalf of tremes: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade, ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@ncaak ncaak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 29, 2023
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 29, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ncaak, tremes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tremes tremes changed the title increase number of query attempts to the processing status endpoint i… NO-JIRA: increase number of query attempts to the processing status endpoint i… Nov 29, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 29, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tremes: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

…n techpreview

This PR implements a new data enhancement to...

Categories

  • Bugfix
  • Data Enhancement
  • Feature
  • Backporting
  • Others (CI, Infrastructure, Documentation)

Sample Archive

  • path/to/sample_data.json

Documentation

  • path/to/documentation.md

Unit Tests

  • path/to/file_test.go

Privacy

Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.

Changelog

Breaking Changes

Yes/No

References

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/???
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/???

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Nov 30, 2023

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade

@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Nov 30, 2023

/override ci/prow/e2e

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 30, 2023

@tremes: Overrode contexts on behalf of tremes: ci/prow/e2e

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 30, 2023

@tremes: Overrode contexts on behalf of tremes: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade, ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@JoaoFula
Copy link
Contributor

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Nov 30, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD f440fa0 and 2 for PR HEAD 8152991 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4d4542e and 1 for PR HEAD 8152991 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 9b91ed4 and 0 for PR HEAD 8152991 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

Revision 8152991 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 1, 2023
@tremes
Copy link
Contributor Author

tremes commented Dec 2, 2023

/unhold
/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 2, 2023
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 2, 2023

@tremes: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 0db5f8c into openshift:master Dec 2, 2023
9 checks passed
JoaoFula pushed a commit to JoaoFula/insights-operator that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants