-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-39111: collect some nmstate customresources #986
Conversation
@tremes: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39111, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@tremes: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39111, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ncaak, tremes The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
7 similar comments
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
/test insights-operator-e2e-tests |
/retest |
Test failures are about missing file in the archive, but it's not related to this change |
@tremes: Overrode contexts on behalf of tremes: ci/prow/insights-operator-e2e-tests In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@tremes: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@tremes: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39111: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-39111 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira backport release-4.17, release-4.16, release-4.15 |
/jira backport release-4.17,release-4.16,release-4.15 |
@tremes: The following backport issues have been created:
Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-ci-robot: #986 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.17":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-insights-operator |
Categories
Sample Archive
docs/insights-archive-sample/cluster-scoped-resources/nmstate.io/nodenetworkconfigurationpolicies/policy-name.json
docs/insights-archive-sample/cluster-scoped-resources/nmstate.io/nodenetworkstates/ip-10-0-21-41.us-east-2.compute.internal.json
docs/insights-archive-sample/cluster-scoped-resources/nmstate.io/nodenetworkstates/ip-10-0-24-83.us-east-2.compute.internal.json
docs/insights-archive-sample/cluster-scoped-resources/nmstate.io/nodenetworkstates/ip-10-0-42-30.us-east-2.compute.internal.json
docs/insights-archive-sample/cluster-scoped-resources/nmstate.io/nodenetworkstates/ip-10-0-61-249.us-east-2.compute.internal.json
Documentation
docs/gathered-data.md
Unit Tests
pkg/gatherers/clusterconfig/gather_nmstate_node_network_configuration_policy_test.go
pkg/gatherers/clusterconfig/gather_nmstate_nodenetworkstate_test.go
Privacy
Yes. There are no sensitive data in the newly collected information.
Changelog
Breaking Changes
No
References
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-39111
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-14148
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/???