-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validate exec subcommands in a composite #3658
Validate exec subcommands in a composite #3658
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3658 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 45.49% 45.50% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 122 122
Lines 12286 12290 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 5589 5593 +4
Misses 6146 6146
Partials 551 551
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Works for me 👍
/lgtm
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kadel The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
17 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
5 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
15 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
* Validate exec subcommands in composite * Add integration test
* Adds documentation on Devfile file reference (#3487) **What type of PR is this?** > Uncomment only one ` /kind` line, and delete the rest. > For example, `> /kind bug` would simply become: `/kind bug` > Documentation changes: Please include [skip ci] in your commit message as well /kind documentation [skip ci] **What does does this PR do / why we need it**: This PR adds documentation regarding each section of Devfile and what we support / do not support **Which issue(s) this PR fixes**: N/A **How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer**: N/A Signed-off-by: Charlie Drage <charlie@charliedrage.com> * Update file reference documentation (#3675) **What type of PR is this?** > Uncomment only one ` /kind` line, and delete the rest. > For example, `> /kind bug` would simply become: `/kind bug` /kind documentation [skip ci] **What does does this PR do / why we need it**: Updates the file reference documentation to not have the introductory section and move unsupported features to the bottom. **Which issue(s) this PR fixes**: N/A **PR acceptance criteria**: N/A **How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer**: N/A Signed-off-by: Charlie Drage <charlie@charliedrage.com> * make odo delete work on s2i components in experimental mode (#3649) * Fixes GetRunningPodNameByComponent for the CLI runners (#3666) * increase ResponseHeaderTimeout (#3674) * Make the file sync destination more consistent (#3662) * Make the file sync destination more consistent Signed-off-by: John Collier <John.J.Collier@ibm.com> * Update tests to use PROJECTS_ROOT Signed-off-by: John Collier <John.J.Collier@ibm.com> * Fix workdir in tests Signed-off-by: John Collier <John.J.Collier@ibm.com> * Remove more references to nodejs-starter Signed-off-by: John Collier <John.J.Collier@ibm.com> * Update more sample devfiles Signed-off-by: John Collier <John.J.Collier@ibm.com> * make odo catalog list components work outside of experimental mode (#3669) * make odo catalog list components work outside of experimental mode * moved the logic to cli * Ignore error while checking for imagestream support * rearranged the catalog list * Validate exec subcommands in a composite (#3658) * Validate exec subcommands in composite * Add integration test * added --s2i flag for `odo create` command * corrected error messages * Corrected flag description and validation * added --s2i flag for `odo create` command * Make Devfile the default deployment mechanism for odo **What type of PR is this?** > Uncomment only one ` /kind` line, and delete the rest. > For example, `> /kind bug` would simply become: `/kind bug` /kind feature **What does does this PR do / why we need it**: Makes Devfile the default deployment mechanism, removing S2I in favour of Devfile deployment. **Which issue(s) this PR fixes**: Closes #3550 **How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer**: Run: ```sh odo preference set experimental false odo create --starter nodejs odo push ``` Co-authored-by: Girish Ramnani <girishramnani95@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Mrinal Das <mrinald7@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Tomas Kral <tkral@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: John Collier <John.J.Collier@ibm.com> Co-authored-by: Devang Gaur <devang.gaur.7@gmail.com>
* Validate exec subcommands in composite * Add integration test
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What does does this PR do / why we need it:
This PR fixes an issue with composite commands where exec subcommands are not validated (such as exec commands that reference an invalid component). With this PR, when we recursively validate the command-tree in a composite command, we now make sure to validate any exec commands.
Composite subcommands were already being validated.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #3656
PR acceptance criteria:
Unit test
Integration test
How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer:
This devfile has a composite command whose exec subcommand points to a non-existent component. Odo will spit out the following error when you try to push:
the composite command "buildandmkdir" references an invalid command "mkdir": the command does not map to a supported component