feat(template): Adding setuptools as a build-system option

[Anavelyz]

Pull Request description

• Adding documentation about setuptools.
• Enable option in TUI for setuptools.
• Adding setuptools as a build-system:
  • Creating a setuptools-pyproject.toml.
  • Editing post_gen_project.py.
  • Editing cookiecutter.json.
  • Editing Makefile of the template.
  • Adding setuptools in conda/dev.yaml.
  • Adding setuptools to build-system.sh
  • Adding code to base.sh to check if the setuptools command is available in the system.
• Standardize the use of literal strings within the template with double quotes.
• Adding noqa in profile.py to ignore ruff warnings

Solve #53

Pull Request checklists

This PR is a:

• bug-fix
• new feature
• maintenance

About this PR:

• it includes tests.
• the tests are executed on CI.
• the tests generate log file(s) (path).
• pre-commit hooks were executed locally.
• this PR requires a project documentation update.

Author's checklist:

• I have reviewed the changes and it contains no misspelling.
• The code is well commented, especially in the parts that contain more complexity.
• New and old tests passed locally.

Reviewer's Checklist

• I managed to reproduce the problem locally from the main branch
• I managed to test the new changes locally
• I confirm that the issues mentioned were fixed/resolved.

[Anavelyz]

@xmnlab In tests/smoke/base.sh there is the same for setuptools as in meson, do I leave it as it is now or change it to pip install -e .?

[xmnlab]

@xmnlab In tests/smoke/base.sh there is the same for setuptools as in meson, do I leave it as it is now or change it to pip install -e .?

feel free to keep it .. as both are the same .. it is not a problem .. thanks

[xmnlab]

@Anavelyz in general looks good to me.
the only problem now is that there is no setuptools command: https://github.com/osl-incubator/scicookie/actions/runs/5456097301/jobs/9928662242?pr=140#step:5:1820
and for that reason it cannot install the command with pip

as setuptool is kind the legacy because in the past we just used to use setuptools and maybe also it is used as dependency for the other build-system, let's use it in the else case. and maybe add a comment there ... I will add a comment direct in the file as well

[xmnlab]

thanks @Anavelyz

[Anavelyz]

@xmnlab In the future, for setuptools, we can add the options to configure it through setup.cfg or setup.py.

[xmnlab]

@Anavelyz I hear you, but my impression is that the community is trying to kill setuptools ... so maybe first it would be nice to see if it would be worthy or not
although setuptools is still used massively

[github-actions]

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.3.0 🎉

The release is available on:

• 0.3.0
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀