Skip to content

Conversation

@Dunqing
Copy link
Member

@Dunqing Dunqing commented Oct 20, 2025

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added A-ast-tools Area - AST tools A-formatter Area - Formatter labels Oct 20, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

Dunqing commented Oct 20, 2025


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Oct 21, 2025

Merge activity

@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 10-20-refactor_formatter_improve_handling_of_type_cast_node branch from f2c0f54 to f52863d Compare October 21, 2025 04:36
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 10-20-refactor_formatter_improve_comments_handling branch from 354f0c5 to 9d914a3 Compare October 21, 2025 04:37
Base automatically changed from 10-20-refactor_formatter_improve_handling_of_type_cast_node to main October 21, 2025 04:42
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 9d914a3 into main Oct 21, 2025
21 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Oct 21, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 10-20-refactor_formatter_improve_comments_handling branch October 21, 2025 04:42
@Boshen Boshen mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2025
graphite-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
## [0.7.0] - 2025-10-21

### 🚀 Features

- 6dfcd80 oxfmt: Search both .json and .jsonc config file (#14848) (leaysgur)
- aa024d9 formatter: Wrap parenthesis for `AssignmentExpression` that are inside `ComputedMemberExpression` (#14834) (Dunqing)

### 🐛 Bug Fixes

- 88fb768 formatter: Correct handling of ignore comment for `TSUnionType` and `TSMappedType` (#14824) (Dunqing)
- f7727c7 formatter: Ignore comment doesn't work for the expression statement (#14817) (Dunqing)
- 7a420a1 oxfmt: Handle `.d.ts` file correctly (#14835) (leaysgur)

### 🚜 Refactor

- 6fa7420 oxfmt: Use custom ignore builder (#14850) (leaysgur)
- 9d914a3 formatter: Improve comments handling (#14816) (Dunqing)
- f52863d formatter: Improve handling of type cast node (#14815) (Dunqing)
graphite-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-ast-tools Area - AST tools A-formatter Area - Formatter C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants