You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally the enhancement of the completion in click was considered as better hosted in a separated project in click-contrib, but now some new completion features has been added in click, duplicating the features in click-contrib. I think it would be interesting to merge both implementations in click.
Fortunately, two different approaches have been used and I think they both have some advantages:
click-completion focuses on the completion at the type level
click focuses on the completion at the command level
I've been trying to address the open PRs about completion before 7.1, and I've come to the conclusion that Click's completion system needs a comprehensive redesign. I'd like to discuss what that looks like in #1484.
I'm not sure where click-completion fits at this point. I would love to get Click's completion support to the point where click-completion can be deprecated, and I would love to bring on the completion maintainers to help here. But I don't think I want to just copy click-completion into Click anymore. How do you feel about closing this and discussing more at #1484?
Originally the enhancement of the completion in click was considered as better hosted in a separated project in click-contrib, but now some new completion features has been added in click, duplicating the features in click-contrib. I think it would be interesting to merge both implementations in click.
Fortunately, two different approaches have been used and I think they both have some advantages:
as seen in click-contrib/click-completion#12 , both can be useful depending on the use case.
My hope with this issue is to:
in order to actually produce a pull request for the merge
@stopthatcow @Konubinix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: