feat: add StorageWriter standalone type
#9507
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
joshieDo
added
C-enhancement
joshieDo
requested review from
rkrasiuk,
rakita,
shekhirin and
onbjerg
as code owners
mattsse
approved these changes
Jul 16, 2024
|
@Rjected we should unify this with the sf/db tasks imo |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ref #9040
Introduces
StorageWriterstandalone type that given the different storage types decides how best it's written to storage.The goal is to move more and more writer traits/impl into this type.