AST validate that a contract does not have a function with contract name #496
Annotations
12 errors
actual output differs from expected:
tests/ui/parser/contract_function_shared_name.stderr#L8
this line was expected to be ` = note: if you intend this to be a constructor, use `constructor(...) { ... }` to define it`
|
test ubuntu-latest 1.82
Process completed with exit code 100.
|
actual output differs from expected:
tests/ui/parser/contract_function_shared_name.stderr#L8
this line was expected to be ` = note: if you intend this to be a constructor, use `constructor(...) { ... }` to define it`
|
test ubuntu-latest stable
Process completed with exit code 100.
|
actual output differs from expected:
tests/ui/parser/contract_function_shared_name.stderr#L8
this line was expected to be ` = note: if you intend this to be a constructor, use `constructor(...) { ... }` to define it`
|
test macos-latest stable
Process completed with exit code 100.
|
clippy
Process completed with exit code 101.
|
actual output differs from expected:
tests/ui/parser/contract_function_shared_name.stderr#L8
this line was expected to be ` = note: if you intend this to be a constructor, use `constructor(...) { ... }` to define it`
|
test windows-latest stable
Process completed with exit code 1.
|
actual output differs from expected:
tests/ui/parser/contract_function_shared_name.stderr#L8
this line was expected to be ` = note: if you intend this to be a constructor, use `constructor(...) { ... }` to define it`
|
test ubuntu-latest nightly
Process completed with exit code 100.
|
ci success
Process completed with exit code 1.
|