Skip to content

AST validate that a contract does not have a function with contract name #496

AST validate that a contract does not have a function with contract name

AST validate that a contract does not have a function with contract name #496

Triggered via pull request November 18, 2024 12:12
Status Failure
Total duration 4m 23s
Artifacts

ci.yml

on: pull_request
Matrix: test
ci success
7s
ci success
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

12 errors
actual output differs from expected: tests/ui/parser/contract_function_shared_name.stderr#L8
this line was expected to be ` = note: if you intend this to be a constructor, use `constructor(...) { ... }` to define it`
test ubuntu-latest 1.82
Process completed with exit code 100.
actual output differs from expected: tests/ui/parser/contract_function_shared_name.stderr#L8
this line was expected to be ` = note: if you intend this to be a constructor, use `constructor(...) { ... }` to define it`
test ubuntu-latest stable
Process completed with exit code 100.
actual output differs from expected: tests/ui/parser/contract_function_shared_name.stderr#L8
this line was expected to be ` = note: if you intend this to be a constructor, use `constructor(...) { ... }` to define it`
test macos-latest stable
Process completed with exit code 100.
clippy
Process completed with exit code 101.
actual output differs from expected: tests/ui/parser/contract_function_shared_name.stderr#L8
this line was expected to be ` = note: if you intend this to be a constructor, use `constructor(...) { ... }` to define it`
test windows-latest stable
Process completed with exit code 1.
actual output differs from expected: tests/ui/parser/contract_function_shared_name.stderr#L8
this line was expected to be ` = note: if you intend this to be a constructor, use `constructor(...) { ... }` to define it`
test ubuntu-latest nightly
Process completed with exit code 100.
ci success
Process completed with exit code 1.