-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Proto] Qadence Tree #278
[Proto] Qadence Tree #278
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @dominikandreasseitz looks fine as a basis. We should discuss this in the new year on how to expand on this and what kind of functionality we need to include.
@@ -39,6 +40,29 @@ def unique(x: Iterable) -> List: | |||
return list(set(x)) | |||
|
|||
|
|||
@dataclass | |||
class ParamContainer: | |||
circ_vparams: ParamDictType |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make sense to have a single dict like:
vparams = {"circuit": ParamDictType, "observable": ParmaDictType}
?
convert_block_fn = getattr(module, "convert_block") | ||
|
||
except (ImportError, ModuleNotFoundError): | ||
pass |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we really pass here ?
@dominikandreasseitz @Doomsk we should coordinate on how to proceed on this. |
Closing given the issue created in the new expression system. |
archiving this @Roland-djee |
Closes #399